In bouts of self criticism I occasionally ask myself whether the reality of this world has passed me without my noticing, or whether I am in fact the one who is particularly realistic. There are those that smirk or smile when I speak of the dreams of international justice that we had in the eighties. We were hopeful that we could overcome the century of world wars and widespread holocausts, which were not just catastrophic for Jews, but for millions of other human beings in apparently far-off countries.
The smirk is alarming for a number of reasons, but mostly because there seems to be a growing acceptableness about millions of people dying in atrocities committed for profit. If this has already become the common attitude of people living in our western societies, then it looks like Alduous Huxley may have been right after all – even though his “brave new world†was made up of physical rather than mental clones. Perhaps human beings are far more susceptible to “Gleichschaltung†than I had imagined.
It is easy to criticise the left-wing for their lack of “reality†but what kind of “reality†are we subscribing to? The ideal of socialism has long suffered defeat and moderate Socialists have long ago taken on a form of capitalism “with a friendly face†- which in fact only suggests that there is an element to this kind of politics that is not openly shown. This almost always entails the bowing down to the American dominance without admitting it.
Some have welcomed the policies of G.W. Bush because they are openly violent towards any who stand in the way of what this administration regards as “progressâ€. It is a welcome alternative to those who were continually pulling the wool over our eyes, suggesting that there was a moral offensive within their policies that somehow resembled the ideals of the eighties. I believe that it is time to accept that the illusions of the past have always only been instrumental to the profits made by “illustrious†minorities.
But is it really illusory to believe that justice and righteousness should have relevance? Is the “clash of civilisations†a real problem that arises because of the diversity of human ideology, or is it an artificial crisis that arises as result of fundamentalism fuelled on disinformation and greed realised by means of military dominance? It has always been the Art of Deception that has led us into wars – the twentieth century was a typical example for that.
The mixture of Capital and Power has always led, and will always lead to corruption. There are too many people without either, who are subsequently victims of militant policies, wherever they arise. But where lies the alternative? Communism sought to separate the two and only succeeded in creating a new hell. Western democracy sought to install safety measures, which failed miserably because the people and the press lost interest in controlling those in power. In reality, it is the decadence of western society that has gambled away democratic potential.
If we really want to be sober about the whole issue of prosperity, isn’t it true that we the people only have some form of prosperity in order that the rich have someone to take something from?