Lack of feminine women in society.

Women walk around with sand in their vag. Tesla complained about this and I will complain about it too - there are definite lack of feminine women in society.

In the olden days men had chubbier cheeks and were more feminine. For instance, Houdini.

This femininity gave men more civilization and culture, but also quicker tempers. In the olden days men’s feelings were hurt easily, and so they dueled and fought often.

Why in society am I not allowed to punch someone in the nose? Why do I have to be the “bigger man” and walk away! I have emotions and feelings! I want a feminine woman! There are no feminine women anymore, they are all machines automotons with sand in their vags. I want a gentle feminine Japanese woman like ASMR. I want a woman who can nurse me and play with my hair and make me feel good. I want a woman that can soothe me and stroke me. But they are noone to be found. There are no feminine women anymore. The only feminine women are 19 year olds, when they turn 20 they become cold unnurturing and masculine.

My ideal society would be like Germany, where I am allowed to punch someone in the nose if they insult me. But unlike Germany we would be allowed to play M rated games. It would also be like Canada, where you are allowed to date 16 year olds. 16 year olds and 19 year olds are the only feminine women, after age 20 they lose all estrogen and become worker drones and automotons of society.

Why does society say it is acceptable to have gay sex and kiss with a nigger, disturbing you for life, but outlaw dating a simple 16 year old? If there were actual feminine adult women out there I would want to date them. But adult women have no estrogen and look like men, skeletor, michael jackson. If a 16 year old wants to date me the alpha male state says I must refuse and says I am evil. But then they say I am perfectly good and acceptable to have gay sex with a nigger. Society is literally sodom and gommorah, pure evil and torment.

How come if I am in Canada, I can love a 16 year old girl and its perfectly fine and acceptable, but if I cross the river to America I am suddenly evil? Society is insane. Morality is all a lie, they all eat burgers and butcher animals yet deny love to exist. When I was 15 years old, I had a crush on my hot blonde teacher. Why should 15 year olds not be allowed to have sex with their teachers? Why is society so evil? Why does gay cuckery spit on love and all that is good in the world? But this same world encourages people to be gay and kiss ugly, bony looking male niggers.

8 year olds is crossing the line and evil, but if Canada says 16 year olds are okay then how is it evil? America is insane. America murdered and butchered the Native Americans yet tells me I am evil for wanting a feminine woman.

masculinity and femininity have never aligned perfectly with testicles and ovaries.

They did in Pagan times, before the xian cuckery and jew rules and regulations limited us and made us cucks nuns and servants of the tyrants.

Weren’t all cultures pagan at one time? I’m inclined to agree that we lost some value(s) of paganism over time. IMO … all belief paradyms have become too rigid.

An example of “value” lost with the disintegration … or at least integration with other religions … of paganism is human “faith” in nature.

I heard many years ago that some pagan communities would celebrate a young girl’s entry into “womanhood” … the crossing of the threshold that separates girls and women.

The celebration wasn’t based on reaching a certain age … marriage … or first born child.

Rather it was based on an event controlled by nature … her first menstrual cycle.

More emerging thoughts …

Nature suggests girls are ready for marriage at the age of 12 … custom insists the age of 25+ is more suitable.

In the intervening years … 13 years or so … these young girls learn masculine skills and tendencies … suggests the OP title is factual.

How is “nature” even aware of the concept of marriage? Or aware of anything at all?

Language again … reminds me of one of the pillars of Confucian thought … “Rectification of Names”. In a nutshell … there can be no real communication between/among people … communication in this context meaning the message transmitted was received exactly as intended … unless all parties to the communication have exactly the same understanding of each word used in the message.

The intention underpinning the word “nature” has expanded over time … especially in the past 2,500 years.

My use of the word approaches “pure intelligence” … “absolute intelligence”

I was a tomboy way before the age of 12. What of my kind?

The window dressings worn by women in society are not modest by and large and for me, this absurd dressing feels like some heavy man-made cross of superficiality to bear. Who’s dreaming up this horrible shit, men, women, both?

What you refer to as “your kind” … in both genders … may be testimony to my first comment in this thread … masculinity and femininity have never aligned perfectly with testicles and ovaries … by design I’m sure.

Over gen(d)eralizing for sure … yet … the human species has lived under a patriarchal umbrella forever … with few notable exceptions. If this is true … patriarchal customs/rituals serve the male gender of the species specifically with only ancillary benefits accruing to the female gender.

I know. Women are pissed off to high heaven into ridiculousness because of

Oh, it’s true. :imp:

One day the female species will come to realize they are the stronger gender … how many sperm does it take to find … collide with … and penetrate a lone egg? The medical condition known as “low sperm count” suggests a LOT. :slight_smile:

We, the sexes, are different, but we take each others’ differences for granted.

Your comment may point to the Gordian Knot.

At the appointed time humans will discover that there is something about being human that transcends gender.

What does it mean to be human?

The languages of all sciences, all philosophies, all religions, all imagination and so on are woefully inadequate to describe what it means to be human … we are simply too complex.

On the other hand, the language of metaphor can point to conceptual explanations. Let me try.
A human is a heirarchy of substances … the highest being “person”.

  1. Our “person” is a being without form … invisible … substance nonetheless … occupying space in our brain … though not imprisoned … free to go where it pleases. Our “person” functions as our conduit to the universe … including all other living entities on our planet and elsewhere. Our person functions within a very sophisticated security system … likely our DNA. This security system controls access to the library of the universe … the noosphere.

rant time

[tab]

What is personally more bothersome is that the bad patterns instilled upon me at age 12 which are expected to be “unlearned” by age 25… effectively… result in me looking at people age 37 as the fastest path to victory (they are the most desperate, their eggs will stop soon). If society did not lie to me, maybe, i would have figured it out by now. At age 12 we instill fear (way too young) , at age 37 we instill fear (not much time left)… age 25… yeah sure why the hell not? this seems ideal.

we, at the same time, sell this idea of “true love” and “love forever”. these ideas are not compatible. I would say “burn disney”

oh btw i really need to get laid[/tab]

Tom wrote

If folks never acknowledge our differences with honest understanding and appreciate them as divine, it will make for a long time coming. Or another Mobius Strip loop-de-lou.

Since I am such an emotional being, my male partner tempers my temperament. He indulges all of my emotions for he realizes that his love for me is wrapped up in all of those emotions. Thank you Merlin for your calm, patient, sweet temperament when I need it and you the most. You enable me to steady myself. :romance-heartbeating: Thank you my rock.

a mongoose and a merlin … what a potent team!

No it’s the other way around.

Does an alpha male lion serve the other males of the tribe, or brutally attack them once they reach adulthood and hog all the women to himself? Patriarchy serves the elite 1% of males, and the masses of peasant females. The rest…well you saw the titanic didn’t you? Women and children first…Nobody cares if a soldier, or a gangbanger dies, it’s all “part of the plan”…

Women are more mentally insane than males, but physically weaker. Women need a “rock” to steady their emotions. You have it as testimony from the mouth itself.

There is a certain strength in insanity. Thus I can’t debate you, because your statement is not wrong enough to be wrong, nor right enough to be right.

Trixiebelle wrote

More mentally insane than males? That’s debatable.

I’d call it in my case more easily overwhelmed by several emotions that cause a breakdown in communication. Males seem to stuff their emotions and strike out in physical ways when the negative emotional effects accrue. Both sexes exhibit their own insanity.

What I don’t understand is why you find it a negative to need a rock or to be a rock. Conversely, I am the soft place for Merlin to find comfort. Is it insane for a man to need a woman’s tenderness?