Only the first paragraph deals with cuckolding, the last, I don’t know what the fuck that is.
You guys keep taking basic sexual fetishes, and compound them with very alien fetishes, misrepresenting them as a coherent schema, reasonably whole and logical.
The Huns, the nation that defeated Rome under Attila the Hun, were a cuckold society, multiple men married one woman, in fact you COULDN’T get married to a woman you loved unless you convinced another man to join in. Nothing to do with interracial grannies buttfucking one another in what appears to be rape in your description.
Celts likewise had multiple spouse marriages, could favor either sex, be it man or female who married multiple of the other sex.
Jews had cuckqueans, via Polygamy, as do Arabs today. Romans insisted on Monogamy, but had orgies until Augustus (overlook Tiberius and Claudius, laws didn’t apply to them). Greeks had homosexual affairs, but insisted on monogamy.
Paraphilia s of the imagination, but it isn’t unknown terrain, and you will find a variety of sexual practices around the planet. Every stable marriage system built around the family inevitably incorporates elements of cuckolding into it. In America, guys fantasize about walking in on their wives fucking another woman openly. Sometimes it is other men.
Whatever, so be it. The thing is, these cuckolding practices aren’t default mind fuck games, not projected inherently as Alpha and Beta roles, of Master-Slave or Slave-Master relations, nor do most systems involve rape, or brutality, or transexuals.
In the Renaissance Italy, they had aa form of platonic erotic relations, where eomen who were married off by their family were allowed a non-sexual boyfriend, they were allowed the deepest emotional bonds and shows of effection and intimacy, short of sexual touching of any kind. The husbands didn’t want the wife in such a way either, having their own mistress, but would keep servants/guards on them constantly. Cuckolding featured even in the Bible at times, both approvingly (banging the dethroned king’s harem like a fucking babboon) and of course dissaprovingly as well.
Lots and lots of fluxuation, you want to break it down like Emilie Durkheim, and find the least complicated versions of it, and call that actual thing, when all exterior elements are removed.
All you did was introduce a thread about “cuckolding”, then insisted it was about “power relations”, which it isn’t inherently, but many forms are… then involving psychological mind fucking, making it equitable to force a involuntary partner on her (called rape in most places)- thus really isn’t cuckolding at this point, but forced sex, a sadistic form of psychological BDSM, not to mention the Tranny shit, which 99.9% of historic cuckolding has nothing to do with.
So, this is a philosophy site. What have we gained? By you writing this crude, poorly thought out male fantasy of yours (Trixie, your not bridging the male and female worlds like you think you are, your just one deeply perverted guy) did we learn anything about the generation or dissolution of cuckolding in terns of the projection of a visual erotic paraphilia? Not really, you didn’t pay any attention to the Metaxy inherent in your thought, cause you “hate” binary logic, such as Porphyry’s Tree. If you broke it down in Metaxy, you would quickly find your merging fantasy upon fantasy, assuming they are naturally integrated and coherent.
Reason this is wrong, is that you managed to justify rape, or perhaps we can say “surprise sex” from a relation built around systematic sexual denial, with mild hints at cuckolding.
This results in terribly sloppy Syllogism, as just about everything in teems of sexuality becomes Cuckolding, and when compared -----, Rape becomes the logical acceptable response. It isn’t. We don’t go around raping people because they don’t put out for us. And just because they aren’t putting out, doesn’t mean they are cuckolding, just think your the Burger King, they are wanting sexual intercourse their way, not yours, the McDonalds way.
Your not allowing for a wide range of sexual volition, a wide range of choices and morphing emotional responses here.
The woman in your fantasy is one dimensional, not exactly a Agent of Free Will. Your insisting on a sexual Dasein without considering how things actually arise and occur.
People are complex creatures, and nothing is more complex and complicated than sexual relationships. More often than not, in some firm or another, the vast majority deals with cuckolding, however brief or lasting- and we don’t go around sticking Trannies on people, raping them for it.
Instead, we encourage communication, intimacy, honesty, bonding. Cuckolding has persist willingly in a open marriage on very positive terms even here, but usually not, the need for cuckolding goes away, as both partners learn more about the needs, worries, and desires of the other. The best and most stable relationships tend to be monogamous, and this us the standard even in ancient and foreign cultures where polygamy and polyandry were allowed and encourage.
You don’t set yourself up for success when your fantasizing about revenge sex for mispercieved slights. If your relationship is so badly degenerated, that your at the point of complete sexual denial unless you get a Granny to rape her, because you know her so well because “that’s her cue” for rape, “Hey there Trixie, I’m doing this cause I want raped”, then I suggest going to couples therapy immediately, and I hate to say this, perhaps split up. I support relationships built out of love and attraction, but what your describing is absurd, confused, self deceiving, and gives you and others the impression it is a swell idea to treat a woman like a fucking abused animal, because she isn’t getting you off to your satisfaction. It sends a wrong signal, especially on this forum full of confused Nietzscheans high off the Sado-Maschoism of de Sade’s self destructive Libertine Philosophy. It isn’t a healthy way for people to live, everyone is dehumanized, even the ring leaders by each other in the end, harming each other as they go on.
It would be better if we just have a earnest discussion about sexuality, we got frustrated Nietzscheans on one side demoralized at their immature experiences with women, and demoralized feminists deotalized at their disaster relations with men, and both systems advocate separation and sterility, negating family life, raising the young, binging with your mates as part of a larger family in a even larger community.
That’s what sex really is about, producing stable relations, good children, deep and satisfying love and support, learning who you are in a introspective sense, as well in a ever wider world. Nobody should be scared of good wholesome sexual relations, devoid of psycho-mindfuck imperatives and delusions. One you gain a fetish, hard to shake, but it shouldn’t dictate who you are interpersonally.
In your post above, I don’t see a man who has it all figured out, but one who is confused and lost regarding the roots of his own motivations. A man who doesn’t care about others, or himself, or the circumstances under which intimacy is formed. It is all a mockery to you.
I could perhaps write it off as a attempt at make jockular joking around, but you’ve been setting a pattern for this. Likewise you S57, you’ve become more militant and controlling as of late, you need to stop being so prejudiced and open up to other ways of thinking and living. You act like you just stepped off the Mayflower, only the sexyal forms you advocate is permitted, no one else’s. It is the ultimate form if sexual chauvenism. You need to be less judgmental and more open to others, especially when you don’t agree with them. “Tolerance” shall be the forum safe word from now on.
And Trixie, you need to go use the Mens Room potty from now on. There isn’t a hint of femininity in your perverted mind, your the mist perverted sex crazed guy ever on this forum. Go stand in front of a urinal, and don’t come back until you’ve learned what love really is. Sing this song as you urinate, and reflect on it’s meaning.
m.youtube.com/watch?v=raNGeq3_DtM