If you’ve thought about it as much as I have, then why do you end up using my language and points after I’ve used it first??
Your originality lies in abstract ideas of masculinity and femininity… My perspective on your tours here to that regard is that you want everyone to fit into a transgendered box, when it’s simply not true…
Sexual stratification is objectively true…
The fact that I’m a transgendered heterosexual, is not objectively true! It’s funny! But not true!
Nobody has any mutually exclusive dreams when the DnA machine is in town, no sir-i-bobski.
If joe and charlee both want to bang suzie, they both get to bang suzie.
If joe and charlee both want to be scientists, they both get to be scientists.
it’s a case of aristocratic morality vs. herd mentality.
Your view of it is tainted by the mad kings, popes, and inbred rulers that tainted society.
But a baby will venture in the street if it is not guided, a baby has no knowledge of medicine or of the mind.
It must be fed properly, with no guidance it will wander as a chicken.
The DnA machine will make people healthy, cure diseases, and make people beautiful.
If people don’t want that, that is the equivalent of a baby who refuses to eat it’s food and wants to wallow in it’s toxic feces for all of eternity. It is constantly crying, whining, but is too unconscious to actually figure out why.
2op Isn’t the meaning of that ultimately pointless? Not your post, I mean sexual stratification; what does it achieve in the end? and isn’t it something akin to a game [if there is no teleology] and the world will keep turning irrespective of such games. Real is real, sexual stratification [or stratification et al] are not real?
