alpha chicks and beta chicks

Half-formed posts, inchoate philosophies, and the germs of deep thought.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby gib » Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:00 am

Magnus Anderson wrote:Alright then. I assumed you are claiming they are superior because that's what the word alpha implies. If you simply mean intimidating . . . that's fine.


Well, alpha (to me) implies dominant, and that *can* be construed as superior, if by superior we mean higher up on the hierarchy. But I agree that being higher up on the hierarchy doesn't always mean being fit for that position.

A Shieldmaiden wrote:She also says " I am in love"

and love does strange things to women....... and men.


It's like being an ice cube in an oven.
My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

“Everyone is always like ‘how do you feel about feminism? how do you feel about feminism?’ and it’s like maybe I don’t wanna fucking talk about feminism, maybe I just wanna be a female producer, because it’s like even being a female producer is so rare it drives people fucking crazy. It’s like my sheer existence is like a political act, I think, to a lot of people. It’s not to me.”

- Claire Boucher
User avatar
gib
little shitheaded Buddha
 
Posts: 8039
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: lost (don't try to find me)

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby Pandora » Fri Mar 10, 2017 9:13 am

Magnus Anderson wrote:Women are by their nature slaves. Similar to children, though better. Slave is someone whose own choices are so poor in relation to other organisms that these other organisms have no choice but to limit their choices to some degree. We can say that slaves are organisms that have a significant degree of undeserved freedom. Now these slaves, I mean women, have been emancipated, and their inclinations, previously deemed to be inferior and in need of restraint, are now free for all to see. And I really think it's sad to see males being attracted to them.

*sigh*
User avatar
Pandora
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3520
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Ward 6

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby A Shieldmaiden » Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:31 am

You gotta laugh..... HA!
The man that walks his own road, walks alone

Old Norse Proverb
User avatar
A Shieldmaiden
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1623
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:13 am

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby Magnus Anderson » Fri Mar 10, 2017 2:10 pm

No, you got to show your emotions. Whether it's a laugh or a sigh is irrelevant. That's what women do. The world must know how you feel about it.

(:
User avatar
Magnus Anderson
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2753
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:26 pm

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby Arcturus Descending » Mon Mar 20, 2017 9:04 pm

Xunzian

A central question of my philosophy, one I struggle with on a daily basis is "Am I reading the text or is the text reading me?"


That's an interesting way of expressing it. If I understand what you mean by the latter,
I think that you are probably more ahead of the game then many of us are. I would say that you are already conscious of the fact that as you read, you may be at certain times already forming an opinion or have a personal opinion or bias as to what you are reading and that may be influencing you in what you seem to feel is a more positive way (you automatically agree with what you read) or a negative one, where you automatically disagree with what you read ~~ again, if that is basically what you mean by "reading me".

It's not an easy thing for many to withhold judgment on whether the writer is right or wrong by simply reading the text in a detached way and doing the real "thinking" about it later on. We "go into" books or texts with our own pre-conceived ideas even though what we actually wish for, hope for, is to see another's point of view, another way of thinking, another theory or hypothesis and to gain more knowledge than we've had before.

This is the way the human mind works. It needs to be slowed down a bit so we can better understand what it is the writer is trying to say instead of imagining what we believe he is trying to say.


Does this make sense?

Yes, it does because I am aware of my own propensity to get ahead of myself and to allow my own thoughts and opinions to at times rise up and influence me in the journey of my reading - instead of simply reading without "knowing" where the author is going or wants to go...

Of course, that doesn't mean that we don't reflect on what we read ~ later on or as we go on- but without pre-judgment.

Am I wrong?
SAPERE AUDE!


You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your INFORMED opinion. No one is entitled to be ignorant.”
Harlan Ellison

I learn as I write!
User avatar
Arcturus Descending
Consciousness Seeker
 
Posts: 14231
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 5:15 pm

Re: alpha chicks and beta chicks

Postby barbarianhorde » Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:16 pm

Id fuck Gaga and MIA but not Madonna.

Dont lump these bitches in the same bucket. They are beings and individuals.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
barbarianhorde
Thinker
 
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm

Previous

Return to The Sandbox



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users