Just checked joker’s site, for his invisible section of his site, that you can only see when logged in, I’m now a moderator. Which is odd, cause I can’t post even in that section. Now, I’m linked in a official capacity to a site that greatly resembles the activity of those creepy clown sitings all over the US, moderating the hidden kinky portion of it. This is going to go down well when I’m falsely accused of being a clown, trying to lure kids inti the woods with candy, and they find that site, seeing I moderate the pirnographic area. What the fuck is a moderator of a pornagraphic section supposed to even do? Do I ban people for discussing philosophy and not posting pirn they just beat off too, expecting everyone to indulge in. I don’t wanna comingle my bate fantasies. You can masturbate to the women of your taste, and I will beat off to the women of my own. We aren’t sharing, we aren’t dueling cockswords.
Everybody that is allowed in the hidden section of the forum is a moderator. It’s nothing special in terms of title. Get over yourself man.
You posted in the section a few times with no problems previously. I think you’re making shit up as usual and the only person you’re discrediting is yourself by the way.
I replied, I can’t make threads. And I never wanted to post porn, just you forced me to by spouting all that Anarchism, rebellion, don’t let rules dictate your actions, we will overthrow the government- but no nude pics cause Obama will send the FBI after you…
Of course I had to post a nude pic and make a big deal of it. It was a very tasteful nude pic too, the kind grandpa would look at and smile. My grandpa at least.
Now suddenly I’m the moderator of a pornography site ran by creepy clowns with odd puritanical fetishes requiring the suppression of overt displays of sexuality. I’m Catholic, we are a very sexually open people, haven’t you seen the Catholic school girl uniforms? I don’t think I can be your porn-wrangler.
Well, if you were more specific about the problems afflicting your account instead of acting like a giant douche I could of fixed that a long time ago. Within the next hour or less I’ll get it to where you can create threads in that section. I’m taking necessary steps to not get my forum shut down. What part of that do you not understand?
The part of you asserting anarchism, asserting your particular mindset and worldview is the natural, original state of all men, and that everyone else knows this, but are just bullshitting themselves, that ethics and morality doesn’t exist, but are willing to sacrifice all your beliefs in fear that some corporate moderator might shut your free site down because of a nip pick most men would smile upon seeing instinctively.
It is very confusing.
I don’t own the web hosting sites. If I did however I would do things differently.
Despite not liking the rules or beliefs of others which I view as being ridiculous I contend with them. It’s not like I have a choice when the majority of the internet is owned by a handful of individuals.
So your making ethical formulations, justifying your morals here, but deny people can have these thoughts in far more important situations?
If your thinking pattern is legitimate here, then what prevents at least some people for having situational considerations in more important situations?
There is nothing wrong with a boob. This is based in England, the server, they have naked chicks in news papers. Look, Brittany Ward’s boobs, nobody fucking dies from a boob pick:
[MOD EDIT: NSFW pic tabbed -Carleas]
[tab]
[/tab]
Look, similar naked chicks all over the Vatican, Jesus is straight up okay with floaty naked people:
Look at thus guy, he is triumphantly proud to be naked. He stands in front of people and says “behold my majesty” and teachers line up whole classrooms full of children in front of his bouncy nads, and tell them to stare at it till your inspired, that’s culture. Makes you smarter or some shit.
Your asserting some Pilgrim Puritanical bullshit most Christians don’t even accept. We have naked women everywhere. Little boobie here, tight ass there, under clever, distracting clothes. They don’t send out the swat team on this shit. There isn’t a good reason to look at Brittany Ward and stand agast at the horrors of a nude, beautiful female form. If your human, make it female, you know that is good. All this crap about personal tastes aside, you know she is magnificent. Look at her boobs, tell me I’m wrong. What swat team is kicking your down for this shit? It clearly would violate the first amendment.
[MOD EDIT: NSFW pic removed -Carleas]
That is the very essence of epicurian philosophy. She should be proncing around a garden reciting philosophical poetry.
If there is ever a panic in the streets, and people are crying in flight that there is a legion of female nude models coming down the street, I’m gonna tell everyone don’t worry, I will handle this one, and I’m taking off running in the direction they are all fleeing from, stripping my belt off as I go.
A fucking boob harms nobody. It makes milk, babies love that shit. It isn’t scary. The most saintly of saintly popes in the darkest of the dark ages were surrounded by nudity, got nude themselves on a daily basis, and your trying to tell me now, that the world would up and fucking collapse if someone say a delightful tit on a anarchist website? Who the fuck are you kidding?
What, Obama doesn’t want anarchists from getting stiffies now? Don’t wack off Joker, Uncle Sam is watching.
So I can post this:
[MOD EDIT: NSFW picture tabbed - Carleas]
[tab]
[/tab]
but can’t go all Peony Pavilion and post this:
(image edited out by MagsJ: 26-10-16 at 13:16
That is some bizarre logic, and any philosopher of any worth would know seeing Lorena Garcia is far, far less damaging to the mind (not at all damaging honestly, likely do you some good, getting the blood flowing) than that knife to the neck shit you fantasize about. Your not scared about describing your apocalypse, but no nips and delightful bums? Beautiful naked chicks smiling like that can’t exist in your dysutopia. They all were raped to death or died of yeast infections. They are a threat to your belief system. I think naked pics of attractive, wonderful, happy looking women who are safe and well nourished are the best counter to your messed up philosophy. It is the perfect philosophical statement to counter your positions. You say Will to Power, I say Look at her Titties.
Will you be needing that kleenex and lotion still?
You can now create threads in that section giant douche.
I don’t want to. I’m not going to be told what to do, in terms of morality or laws, right or wrong, by a anarchist nihilist of all fucking people. If I want to put a picture of a naked woman on the forum, I’ll put it in the middle of everywhere, cause it proves your a lying hypocrite. All the sudden you gotta turn into a police state for dire reasons, when nothing that dire is occurring. No self respecting anarchist is gonna let the threat of a warning, banning or shutdown dictate their behavior. At what point did you become a subservient slave to the system? A system that likely doesn’t even exist, just made up in your head and projected from others, gained by you from a garbled understanding of how the world operates? World is full of titties. Government officials all over the world grope them. They aren’t after you.
Why are you editing images out, Carleas said there could be situations when nudity is shown, he just had trouble conceiving it in advance in a philosophical context- this is that context… You literally just proved my point I’m making about Joker’s irrationality in yourself, you let a pic of a in progress murder stay up, while hiding the beautiful nude pic of a smiling woman. You both back ISIS’s worldview, no very human bodily nudity, but blood and gore to the extreme.
What, if I said it in words instead of a picture would it somehow change it? If I describe a naked female form in extreme erotic detail, this isn’t more or less equal to seeing it in pictorial expression. If Ecmandu can describe to everyone how to imagine raping a woman in a mnemonic visualization, saying for others to do it, that takes a lot more cognitive activity than just looking on a attractive and willing woman who wasn’t raped.
This website allows every absurdity except for what is mist essentially human, the expression of the boob and twat. I’m gonna start posting like, a 90 pics of people being executed in mass, then 10 of pretty women acting coy, and we will see which ones really terrify you. Makes no sense nudity is banned when we can talk about it to disturbing degrees, and have no restrictions on anything else. Western civilization in the not too distant past used to paint nude chicks on the ceilings of operas, cause it was classy. At what fucking point did a voluntarily named woman become the wtost thing ever to behold?
Idiot.
Is that how you always announce yourself?
Yes… the U.K. has ‘page 3’ and ‘top shelf’ adult magazines in our newsagents, but we don’t allow exposed genitals in general adult public-consumption communications, as that’s for private viewing with you and your Kleenex tee hee hee 
Kleenex, I never wipe, anywhere, no matter what just came out of me. It smooths the friction of locomotion.
Hey, since men don’t have any clevage to show off, it is discriminatory only women get to show off some of their privates.
Men do have clevage now I think of it, it is ball clevage.
If I cut a hole in my shorts and have photos taken of me walking around of sitting Indian style, all while keeping my jones covered, I should be allowed to post them here. There will be hairy ballsacks popping up at random in threads.
I edited some posts here to hide pictures in tabs, because I check this site at work and definitely some of the pictures in here are not work appropriate (even though they’re acceptable by our otherwise lax content standards).
This.
Yeah, both of you aren’t grounded in the real world where I’m not even bothering with the ridiculous tripe from the both of you.