Try to read my post again, please, because I did not say anything “about what’s right and wrong and who’s responsible for the way things are”. I just asked you something.
You said that I had no moral scruple. How is that not moralizing? I’m saying my view of how the world works doesn’t really entail you or I being able to do something like stop war. People have been warring since before we got here and will continue to into the future. I think the best times are probably right after a good war. Gas is cheaper, people have more money etc… Look at the 50s, the 60s, the 70s. Those appear to have been good times.
Yes, but that does not necessarily imply anything else. Also, it was added by a question. I did not say anything “about what’s right and wrong and who’s responsible for the way things are” (Mr. Reasonable). I just asked you whether it was right that you had no moral scruple.
Source:
That is not “about what’s right and wrong and who’s responsible for the way things are”, because I asked you whether it was right that you had no scruple.
It is a statement - with a question. If I said “you have no car - right?”, would that be moralizing? No. It depends on your answer whether it becomes moralizing or not.
Yea, but one should add here for whom they “have been good times”.