Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

The origins of the imperative, "know thyself", are lost in the sands of time, but the age-old examination of human consciousness continues here.

Re: Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

Postby Meno_ » Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:00 pm

There could be a prime source of timeless beauty that we spring from, that we return to. Or perhaps our so called soul's memory of the illusory past is really a revelation about our soul's essence.
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5470
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

Postby Meno_ » Tue Jul 09, 2019 6:05 pm

Exuberant Teleportation wrote:There could be a prime source of timeless beauty that we spring from, that we return to. Or perhaps our so called soul's memory of the illusory past is really a revelation about our soul's essence.




Yes,
This description is in synch with most religious motives and philosophical suppositions.

The middle ages was noted to realize the significance in "The Anima".
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5470
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

Postby Meno_ » Tue Jul 23, 2019 6:42 am

Consciousness is within and without a general field, where, various forms of evolutionary species develop within variously measured time and space.

The general field theory can only be inferred, from the appearance and the function of memory. That memory is based on binomial signifiers, corresponding to the philosophically predetermined exclusion of a foreground, from a background. The perceptive mode signifies a dynamic structural non linear multidimensional model.

What this may indicates the permeability between various stages of 'memory' or recall.

The evolutionary flux may be driven by the extatuc nature of various 'bits' of memory, that do correspond to various psychic and mental states which are stratified at certain time points into absolute to relative meaningful blends of specie-individuation.
Since individuation is relative to families of resembling qualities, absolute individuation is the necessary conduit through which it has to be reducible to, because individuation as a mode of physical separation is a priori to social grouping, as a aposteriori manifestation, just as psychologically secondary processes follow primary patterns of living self consciessness.

In fact the primary mode of signaling is basically a reintegration if spatial content in functionally reintegrative processes.

Backwards, history is short cut, and it is through simplified planes of various fields, that memory is constructed.

The simple reconstruction must at times of great stress, such as an ecstatic union or disassociation causes, cuts , and shortcuts the significant levels of energy possibly in a loop-backed system, creating huge systems akin to magnetic transformers, where transforming potential energy is built up and creates new forms if ever-changing memory systems.

These pointillistic structures vibrate at varying differential systems, tuning in and out within ranges that are generally preset, automatically.

Egos and induviduated complex consciousness operate the same way, and the range of their vibration, determines the level at which they opt or decline a sustainable source.

In this schema, there is no fear, for instance of ego loss, since the ego exists only as a potential energy source within a transformative system.
The superimposition of math,and physics, biology and chemistry, with functional derivitives such as vibration(musical harmony the formal derivitive of input-output reintegration)
exemplifying the de-differentiation between vibration and levels of energy.

For this reason, there is no measurable difference between the pattern changing ego effects between human birth and death, on an absolutely non permeable bionimal progression of memory, since the a priori manifestation of such memory can be we be causutively demonstrated.

This scenario has progressed since the 1600-1700 hundreds at increasing rate of change, and the static nominal world has been existentially been bracketed, phenomenally in an abrupt indication of a reductive natural causitive process, obfuscating the naturalistic fallacy.

That this proof for immortality is if not yet totally evident, it is because the primal a priori memory has not been differentiated species from sub species.

The necessity for an evolution of consciousness is prerequisite to a natural gross apprehension of Being.
Apprehension is a priori to signification, and it is the very mode of extatic existence itself.

Therefore eternal reoccuramce at least as the mode of apprehension is necessary to eternal signification.

Constant signifiers are implicit in such symbols as the mandala, jing jang, and
where they serve as de-differenting devices born out of religious motives.

These motives are primarily of lower level emotional sources, and such psychic determinants institutionalized into the mainline Vedic coungruances of evolving later religious forms.

Not really in the sense of later, as in before or after, but successively constructed as signifiers are transformed from accumulated phenomenal patterns.
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5470
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Absolute proof of reincarmatio/eternal return

Postby Meno_ » Mon Aug 12, 2019 11:02 pm

the idea of the interritoriality and the exterritoriality of conscious awareness may shed a light in what goes on given an infinite range and duration of the universe, which in turn supports the teleological support for an ontologically shifted certainty, favorinf eternalk life.

set theory from leibnitz through cantor hold promise for this view, given the tossup between absolute containmwent versus in creasing uncertainty through separation.

if the former is more likely, then the containment of a;ll; information has always been a set feature conscious uncertain partial awareness , and manifestation.

That partiality gave rise to what the ego illusion represents: in it's uncertain projections. science has developed through increasin inference, parallelingh the evolutionary splitting of the uncertain from the presumed, and reintegerating each new cycle of facts attaine from such hypothesis. It ios moving away from the certain, self con tained absolute idea, toward it's broken up and cut away parts. kerouac suggested that life becomes a film of broken up stills, and art generally describes this as well. modern art imitates modern liofe, or does science keep up with the fragmented forms of representation which inspired ideas suggested to them much earlier in it.s trajectory. is life an imitation of art?

why would desire, which is foundemental in the art of representing the phenomenon of life, wish to break up an umderlying Absolute? was it a a process pre-drawn by Natural design, negating the fallacy inherent in Naturalism?

it can be argued that the Fall began this process, by seeking conscious awareness and knowledge through the naturally causitive form of information gathering, vis. there be no other method byh which it can be attained, other then adherence to absolute and exclusive containment. but then things get messed up, because implicit in this view, it is the absolute that has been designed to split it's self so as to umderstand it's self.

this goes well with the idea of the need of the convential ego to split into it's smalles elements, so as to understand the whole by a constant reintegeration and separation of self from self.

this is why, the consciousness with which we are endowed with, need to understand this process to view ones' self of the idea that our individuality is really an illusion of the brain to filter out only significantly general bounderies.

at the same time, such myraid of egos need to be again re-contained, within the absolute, to enable a return into types of various levels, otherwise such memory production would be impossioble.

these types are virtually changeless and recoverable within a total sum, that really is generated by conventional egos, and one incarnation can not erase a previous one, except through an effort to gain totally enlightened states, where only formal elements without specific content need to be kept for recall.
Meno_
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5470
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Previous

Return to Psychology and Mind



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users