Page 1 of 1

Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:23 pm
by Jakob
Hugh Hefner said in an early interview that all humans are bisexual, and that only compulsive homosexuality is unnatural. So to stick exclusively with ones own gender, that, he thought, is an affliction or due to one. I am not taking this as a fact, as bisexuality is extremely marginal, but for the sake of an argument.

The other side of this coin might be the homophobe, who is as rigorously afraid of his bisexuality as the ideological lesbian, and who makes it his life purpose to seek out every man he is attracted to that he thinks is gay, so as to say "gaygaygaygaygaybuttsex" all his life long.

We have our own "leernicht" with a huge closet-gay-parade in his signature. This helpless man is seeking for a way out of the closet. It is disgusting. His closet, I mean. Probably other parts too, because why the closet? Ah - of course. A homophobe is likely to be a gay who doesn't measure up to his parents tastes. This is reprehensible.

Anyway, I have made my speculative position known. Please share your views. I will include a fair poll not reflecting any conclusions.
(This is not a homophobic thread. I think that gay men have contributed greatly to our culture. But I also don't blame societies for prohibiting overt gayness. It is quite clearly a deviancy. Its just a question of how deviant you want your society to be. Athens clearly liked it very deviant.)

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 3:13 am
by Ultimate Philosophy 1001
Jakob, I am about to make a thread, just for you, about this very thing.

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:46 am
by perpetualburn
"I am courteous towards them, as towards all small annoyances; to be prickly towards what is small, seemeth to me wisdom for hedgehogs"

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:49 pm
by Jakob
perpetualburn wrote:"I am courteous towards them, as towards all small annoyances; to be prickly towards what is small, seemeth to me wisdom for hedgehogs"

This is why I included the lower 2 options.
"One must always leave the enemy the possibility of retreat." - Caesar.

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 4:50 pm
by Jakob
Ultimate Philosophy 1001 wrote:Jakob, I am about to make a thread, just for you, about this very thing.

Haha. Good luck with that.

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:48 am
by Is_Yde_opN
They are not disgusted, they are jealous of your unrepressed valuing.
You shall value the shit out of it.

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Thu Oct 12, 2017 11:09 pm
by demoralized
i'm going to assume homophobia and homosexuality are do not correlate

gonna assume the same percentage of homophobes are gay as non-homophobes

i voted occasionally

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 5:16 pm
by Fixed Cross
demoralized wrote:i'm going to assume homophobia and homosexuality are do not correlate

gonna assume the same percentage of homophobes are gay as non-homophobes

i voted occasionally

Wrong assumption.
Its been proven that pathological homophobes (those that go out of their way to seek out men they interpret as gay (why o why :) ) and try to hurt them) are all gay.

Actually the logic speaks for itself.
People that seek out what they think is gay and constantly talk about anal sex obviously have fixations on these things. Its really very fucking simple.
Why are they so phobic for themselves? Because it is humiliating to be gay. Thats just a fact. Because I am so honest with myself Ive put myself to the test ten years ago, see if I could get aroused by a man. Well, the answer is a unified No. You can bet your life that the gay-obsessed leatherfetishists here have whole harddrives full of gay porn that they spend their nights watching and "condemning".

Think of a Catholic priest preaching virtue and marriage and in the meantime letting his microbic testicles be caressed by small children. Similar patterns define the assertive homophobe. Except that they aren't in positions of power, so they need to use the attentions of attractive people willing to talk to them, those that are so attractive to them that even their curses send them dizzy with pleasure.

What are we doing, granting them all this?
Are we not Merciful?

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 6:18 pm
by James S Saint
Anyone who dislikes people being homosexual for any reason are labeled "homophobic" so as to defer guilt onto them for not accepting the New World Oder. The idea is to promote that those who dislike our design are merely frightened, weak, and pathetic. Such is done so as to promote more homosexuality and the New World Oder through diminishing and disrespecting any alternative. The opposite psychology is played upon those favoring homosexuality and the New World Oder.

And then of course, eventually the idea is to not merely to accuse them of being weak and frightened, but promote that ALL of those who dislike homosexuality are "actually homosexual themselves, but just denying it. ALL of those who oppose us are weak. And they who support us are the good, just, and righteous. Together we are Strong. We are the World! Sieg Heil!!"

Sound familiar?

It's a childish con game for the mindless masses.

Re: Are homophobes more likely than not to be gay?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2017 9:04 pm
by Meno_
This poll is missing an important and left out category, “I don’t know”. As much as we would like to admit, most of us are in grey territory here, of uncertainty, because there simply is no test to avail the required knowledge . The Kinsey Report is still
relevant, and other than that, a pure subjective belief based on personal experience may not suffice.


The same argument which dealt with the subject~object argument can be paralleled in terms of I~Thou. Some of these questions yet forthcoming,
if, the gay movement proceeds as expected, could
digress into such:

Could a straight man become gay?or
Could a straight man love a gay man and vice versa? or
Could a threesome as an actual family unit develop in the future, supporting each other?

There is no telling, whether today’s experiences could mirror a future in which only the young people of today and of posterity can make a difference.

Nothing is excluded.
Noting the fact, of the sudden and dramatic changes occurring through a few short decades of social change, nothing really would be surprising.

So my position is, “I don’t know”.