Physics of Psychology

The origins of the imperative, "know thyself", are lost in the sands of time, but the age-old examination of human consciousness continues here.

Moderator: MagsJ

Re: Physics of Psychology

Postby James S Saint » Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:36 am

Mithus wrote:Continuing with your ontology, you wrote – before it comes to the subject of Magnetism - , that strong negatives waves, which encounter the strong positive waves of a larger particle, create many points of inertia, which prevent the smaller negative particle from getting too close to the positive particle, instead it veers off to a side, orbiting the positive particle.
Why is it that the negative particle doesn't crash into the positive particle, or, in association to psychology, why don't negative and positive influences mix and neutralize each other?

This gets into more detail concerning my prior post:
James S Saint wrote:
Mithus wrote: But then, the next point is: „When a small negative particle approaches a larger positive particle, the smaller particle grows asymmetrically with its greater increasing noise closer to the larger positive particle.“
When the mind filters out those negative influences to keep it's (positive) emotional charge, what does it mean that those influences still increase and grow „asymmetrically“?

That is an issue of extreme impedance mismatching. The term "asymmetrical" was referring merely to the physical shape of the particle. In a uniform space, a particle will maintain a spherical form. But within a gradient, it becomes less spherical and when in the situation of being a small charge getting very close to a large mass with the opposite charge (an electron approaching a nucleus), the small particle becomes relatively flattened, such as in the pict below:

      Image

This behavior is due to the gradient between the two objects becoming too steep, forming an impenetrable wall between them. Such is what causes the tiny negative electrons to merely float around and orbit much larger positive nuclei of atoms to which they are otherwise drawn strongly toward. Analogous things happen concerning psychology and sociology.

Wave Propagation
For a wave of anything to propagate past a point along its path, that point must raise or lower to the instantaneous value that the wave represents moment by moment as it is passing. As a wave of water passes a certain point, the level of water at that point must increase or decrease to match the wave pattern. It is by that action that the wave propagates from point to point. Each point along the path must reach the value of the prior point in order for the wave pattern to continue. And how quickly those values can change determines the speed of the propagation:
James S Saint wrote:The concept of MCR is still valid but in physics it occurs due to maximum affect rate that is logically possible whereas in psychology it occurs due to maximum perception rate physically possible.

Speed of Propagation
Light propagates at the speed that it does because it is logically impossible for anything to affect anything else at a faster rate than what we refer to as "the speed of light". The speed of PHT is a little different because its propagation rate depends upon how quickly the physical substratum can be affected, how quickly neurons respond. Faster neurons (electric wires or optic fiber) would allow for any associated perception to change faster.

MCR
In the physical universe there is a Maximum Change Rate of affect, MCR, directly responsible for the "speed of light in an [absolute] vacuum". As an electromagnetic wave propagates through space, the electric potential, the "voltage" at each point must raise and lower such as to reflect the value of the passing wave, just as the water level must for a passing water wave. And there is a maximum change rate possible referred to as the MCR. Voltage cannot change faster than the MCR. The MCR is an issue of the voltage having to change at faster than infinite rate in order for the wave to propagate any faster. Because nothing can change faster than infinitely fast, there is a maximum possible propagation rate - "the speed of light in an [absolute] vacuum" - a natural impedance.

The Physics
Since space is filled with propagating waves crossing each other, the voltage values at each point raise and lower such as to reflect not merely one wave passing by, but many waves simultaneously crossing each point. The voltage value at each point is merely the sum of all of the intersecting waves at that point.

Statistically, that means that often the addition of all of the waves will reach the MCR. When that happens, the waves must take longer to continue their travel, thus delays arise in the form of extremely brief "traffic jams". Those single point traffic jams are "MCR points". And the number of them occurring within any given region of space is what gives space its "density" (the "permittivity of free space"). The higher the density of space (the "Affectance density"), the slower light will travel through it because it is not an "absolute vacuum" and delays must occur. When the density reaches extremely high levels, we refer to it as "mass" or "dark matter". Light can still very slowly pass through the dark matter, but gets completely blocked and dispersed by mass. When the change rate gets too high, the waves simply cannot pass until sufficient time has elapsed, "delays". Particles of impenetrable mass are formed when too much delay has caused traffic jams that cannot ever disperse ("subatomic particles").

The Impenetrable Wall - An Exclusion Barrier
The point is that delays occur due to the extreme change rate required at each point in order to have many waves crossing. And that means that if a point in space is at a very high positive value due to a positive wave or pulse traveling by and a very negative pulse happens immediately afterward, the rate of voltage change at that point can become nearly infinite. And that means that a MCR point has occurred and any waves involved must delay their travel. They are impeded.

The very same traffic jam effect that causes limited propagation speed and a mass's inertia also delays strongly positive and negative waves as they interact. And since the electron subatomic particle and the nucleus of an atom are made of such strongly negative and positive waves or pulses, as they approach each other, the constant stream of pulses associated with each particle form a steady impenetrable wall of MCR points between the two particles.

Particle Annihilation
The question becomes, "Why don't they just gradually cancel and disperse into neutral, random radiant energy?" And if the two particles were of equally yet opposite charge and also the same size, that is exactly what would happen. If one of the two particles is not of significantly greater mass, the two particles, although delayed a bit, would annihilate each other into merely a puff of EMR noise of sufficient magnitude to express the amount of energy involved - a "photon". If one is of much greater mass (thus greater energy), it cannot be dispersed at the same rate as the other even if they were otherwise annihilating each other. And that means that the dispersing does not take place.

As particles are releasing tiny portions of their traffic jam, they are constantly absorbing more and reforming themselves from that same surrounding EMR noise that they help create, the ambient space - mass field - "gravity field". For a total annihilation to occur, there must be equally opposite potential and also equal mass. If the annihilation is not total, the particles merely reform as perhaps smaller particles. And if one particle was much more massive than the other, each tiny little pulse interaction between the two particles is not of equal opposing potential because the one with the larger mass will be more spread out. If each tiny portion is not annihilating, the whole cannot annihilate either.

And that is why an electron will never merely rush into a nucleus even through strongly "attracted" toward it. There is an impedance barrier between them. The theory concerning orbiting centrifugal force as the cause, is bogus. If an electron didn't fall into a nucleus merely due to an orbiting centrifugal force, a great, great many electrons would never establish an orbit to begin with as they immediately plunged directly into the nucleus causing serious radioactivity disintegrating all materials (so don't be misled).

Now Back to Psychology

Psycho-Impedance Exclusion Barrier
Sociologically speaking, that same impenetrable wall is formed by the prospect that Israel become Catholic. The two entities are actually drawn toward each other, yet they can never converge. The change would be too great for the high priests to mentally handle. All progress would halt as they argued among themselves as to which is to be more sacred than what. Yet they would hang around each other and feed off of each other's opposing behaviors - the negative not being able to fall into the positive. The same is true for many conceptually defined groups that maintain a sacred order and priority.

The social groups cannot converge because of the totally unacceptable mental and emotional changes required of the persons involved. It is not merely an issue of "those are the bad guys and we are the good guys". It is far more an issue of which idea is believed to be of higher priority, true, or serves a greater purpose. How easy would it be for you to accept that 2+2 is really 5 .. and truly accept the belief? Could you merely accept the irrationality? Most people certainly could not and thus would not. So if any proposed theory ends up requiring that one believe that 2+2=5, the theory will not be accepted by anyone who accepts logical mathematics. The theory might seem plausible and be strongly associated with logical mathematics, but despite such close association, logical mathematics and the theory could never converge. There are many mind puzzles proposed throughout the history of philosophy that demonstrate how two perceived truths can not converge. They are called "paradoxes" - both A and B seem to be true, yet if A is true, B cannot be true and vsvrsa.

Psycho-mass
If contrary theories had an equal amount of application (aka equal "mass" - instances of usefulness), a person is likely to dismiss both into a neutrality of favor and indifference of belief - "annihilation" of acceptance. And if the two theories were equally opposite in perceived hope and threat, no passion toward either direction would be generated - neutral PHT. But given that mathematics requires 2+2=4 in millions of applications and it is merely a newly postulated theory demands that 2+2=5, annihilation into non-belief of both will not occur. The new theory will be rejected, kept separate and isolated (hovering around mathematics, yet never converging with it). Why? Because the field of mathematics is far more spread out into millions of applications and not so easily dismissed.

Socio-Impedance Exclusion Barrier
And socially, given Catholicism is spread so much more widely than Judaism, the two could never annihilate each other even if they had otherwise equally opposing potential .
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 24441
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Physics of Psychology

Postby Mithus » Tue Mar 21, 2017 12:25 am

The next point in your ontology deals with the forming of a “magnetic wave”. You wrote that "a wave of affect, when entering a region of greater noise, gets more delayed and the trailing edge of the wave begins to catch up to the leading edge compressing the entire wave", which makes it to a “magnetic wave”, and further, that "a compressed wave stores its energy potential within a smaller volume yielding a greater affect within the same propagating time frame as a non-compressed wave".

I'm not sure whether you described this effect already in your example of that woman, who “perception-compresses” the smaller object into a singular indivisible concern, or whether this is a different issue.
In the latter case, concerning the Perception of Hope and Threat, what makes a “non-compressed” influence to a “compressed” influence (what does it mean in psychological terms, that the trailing edge of the wave catches up to the leading edge), and what equals that “smaller volume”, wherein the potential is stored?
..... panta rhei .............................................
User avatar
Mithus
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:05 pm

Re: Physics of Psychology

Postby James S Saint » Wed Mar 22, 2017 8:59 am

Mithus wrote:The next point in your ontology deals with the forming of a “magnetic wave”. You wrote that "a wave of affect, when entering a region of greater noise, gets more delayed and the trailing edge of the wave begins to catch up to the leading edge compressing the entire wave", which makes it to a “magnetic wave”, and further, that "a compressed wave stores its energy potential within a smaller volume yielding a greater affect within the same propagating time frame as a non-compressed wave".

The following is an anime that I put together to illustrate what happens when a PHT or electric potential wave encounters an increasing then decreasing mass field density, a gravity field. The mass field retards and compresses the wave, producing a "magnetic" wave component (pink in the anime). Since all of space has some degree of mass field (the affectance), such real waves are always associated and referred to as "electromagnetic waves" or "EMR" (electromagnetic radiation).

    Image

An EMR wave is typically illustrated thusly:
    Electromagnetic Wave 2.gif
    Common Illustration of Electromagnetic Wave
    Electromagnetic Wave 2.gif (16.18 KiB) Viewed 71 times
The understanding that the magnetic wave component is merely the compressed portion of the "electric field" or PHT, is strictly RM:AO. Concurrent physics agrees that such waves compress (become shorter) when entering a gravitational field. RM:AO explains why they do, as well as why they decompress as they leave. Due to the change in affectance density, radio waves that leave Earth into space obtain a longer wavelength as they decompress their magnetic component. If a truly absolute void could be achieved, zero ambient affectance, there would be no magnetic field left and the electric potential wave would be traveling at maximum speed of affect.

Mithus wrote:I'm not sure whether you described this effect already in your example of that woman, who “perception-compresses” the smaller object into a singular indivisible concern, or whether this is a different issue.
In the latter case, concerning the Perception of Hope and Threat, what makes a “non-compressed” influence to a “compressed” influence (what does it mean in psychological terms, that the trailing edge of the wave catches up to the leading edge), and what equals that “smaller volume”, wherein the potential is stored?

The field of physics grows with complexity into the fields of chemistry and electronics. Magnetics is perhaps the most complicated subject within physics and electronics to fully envision and comprehend. In psychology, electronics is a field that more simply addresses the analogous issues. Let me list a few directly analogous terms between electronics and psychology (and sociology):
    • Electric voltage = PHT
    • Electric current = effort
    • Conductor = path of effort
    • Resister = burdensome clutter along the path
    • Inductor = a frustrating path tempting trying too hard, trying to go too fast, "lusting", or impatience.
    • Capacitance = memory
    • Magnetics - compression of hope or threat
    • Distance = degree of association
    • Compression = more closely associated than normal
    • Compressed PHT = oppression: frustration, anticipation
    • Voltage multiplier = teasing so as to amplify desire (amplify PHT)

From that list;
  • Voltage produces a current along a conductor = PHT produces effort along a path
  • Resisters block free current along the conductor, consuming energy = distractive clutter blocks free effort along the path, consuming enthusiasm, passion, and incentive.
  • Inductors retard current, producing magnetic fields, compressing energy = frustrated efforts tempt trying too hard, lusting, possibly anger, "compressing passion" into demand.

These associations could have been easily seen hundreds of years ago, making psychology and sociology into precise measurable sciences much sooner.

Magnetic fields indicate that things are compressed and could be more spread out from their beginning to their end, lengths could be greater, more time could be taken, perceptions could be more distinct, and/or concerns could be more separated.

Socially, these concepts are used to sell products, create both loyalties and rebellions, instill loves, hatreds, ideologies, and racial manipulations.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 24441
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Physics of Psychology

Postby Arminius » Wed Mar 22, 2017 6:40 pm

According to RM:AO, gravity / gravitation and electromagnetism are something like concomitants of the affectance.
Image
User avatar
Arminius
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5047
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Saltus Teutoburgiensis

Re: Physics of Psychology

Postby Mithus » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:20 pm

Arminius wrote:According to RM:AO, gravity / gravitation and electromagnetism are something like concomitants of the affectance.

As far as I understand it, Affectance is defined as ultra-minuscule, mostly randomized electromagnetic pulses, and that which is called “gravity” is an aberrant effect of the natural behavior of affectance, the result of a gradient field of affectance density. And that without electromagnetic radiation, there couldn't be any “gravity”.
..... panta rhei .............................................
User avatar
Mithus
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 10:05 pm

Previous

Return to Psychology and Mind



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users