It is. We could of broken some new ground in philosophy with that Section, or should I say, Sextion.
If attractive women walking around half naked is what it takes to keep a granny who doesn’t take showers out if sight, then I say bring on the skanks.
I want you to quote yourself in your forum signature here saying I’m the same as a Facebook Feminist, and mention this to all the feminist who visit the forum.
Sexuality isn’t sex, neither the activity between.two, or the actuality if the gender. Much of Sexuality is made up, comes and goes. It is why I laugh when Nietzsche and like Sauwelios talk about the masculinity of the “war music” of the Doors, the lead singer was a flaming homo. The only sex that matters is the sex that leads to reproduction, and the sex that keeps couples together till they get to maturity. That is the bare minimum I’m concerned with. Sometimes society can manufacture expensive social nets, like orphanages, child welfare, communal raising of children… but even then, outside of the old Hermetic cult or the Jewish Kibbutz, it is still two parents raising a child to maturity, of their own making.
All this talk of sex or being offended or blah blah blah, Trixie is a confused homo is irrelevant. What matters is, women have a short time frame to attract a potent male, and get knocked up, and keep him around. They dress how they dress to get the dick. Everything they do… is for dick. Economizing forces in nature would of purged their impulses to act in ways that doesn’t attract the dick, or keep the dick around and interested.
Women do what they are meant to do, in getting men interested. This isn’t wrong, it is necessary. A man can fuck a knotted hole in a tree, or a burrito, or gazelle… if we aren’t constantly encouraged to fuck women. That sort of fucking… the fuck of random objects that don’t lead to the possibility of reproduction, is potentially dangerous and useless. Your sex is just as useless.
I remain perpetually in the right for saying this… that is life. You exist because of it, even though you have since turned against it. It is like having a little female kitten you haven’t gotten fixed yet… she gets loose, you find her minutes later howling and screaming while fucking… rolling. Not attractive. Cat gets fat, has babies. Now you have a bunch of kittens. The capacity to love 1 can implies acceptance of reproductive activity. It may seem alien and offensive, not to your taste, but you can’t love a baby kitten without accepting cats must attract, sex, and bring to term their kittens too… and your not involved. Cats are great… till they start marking territory, get into yelling arguments, biting and scratching, fixing them upafterwards with peroxide. You just learn to accept cats as being this way, as it is natural to cats. I accept common reproductive behavior in people without denying their peoplehood or lessening them. It is something that must come to pass for a future. I inpart oppose abortion on this basis, but more so because it is a won’t on disregard of human life on the worst of excuses. Children should be the byproduct of sex. I don’t mean every time, or geriatrics screwing, but for the young and fertile, if your fucking… the whole underlining reason is to make more people… even if your claiming recreation, stress relief, whatever… it is ultimately a act to make kids. People seem impressively good at fucking their birth control up, so it seems we are evolving beyond it’s restraints by having stupid moments in sexual arousal. Good.
I don’t go running up to every half naked woman out there. If she looks my type, I will glance, but I require much more out of a woman. I’m a rare personality type, I also expect to like a woman before signing her, cause if I knock her up, I’m tied to her for 19 years one way or another… and I sure the he’ll don’t want any child of mine aborted by a self centered homicidal twat. So I am careful in the women I choose. I don’t let them choose me anymore… I’ve traditionally was very lazy in letting women ask me out. Now I say no, given the risks involved. A INTJ can’t insure their kids come out as one (rarely do actually, first born tends to mute both parents extremes) but I run a very high chance of producing closely related types, and of similar thinkers popping up in grandchildren. This requires a longer period of education, more intensive parenting… a naturally more intelligent child can grasp more with the right guide in life. This matters more to me than some short skirt, like it did for my father. None the less, I recognize I couldn’t exist without that impulse, we all have people like that in our genetic history, makes up the majority of our ancestors the farther back we go. Why would I turn against this? Why would I hate it? Because you chopped your privates off, wear a dress, and get jealous and easily offended when women play women better than you, stealing the spitlight? Not a good enough reason.
And I may very well deserve to die, but never seem to despite the hardships. Flaws in the karmic distribution theory I suppose.