In my experience, on Planet Earth, women are quite interested in zombies and fantasy things.
You do have a semblance of a point though, males do tend to have higher and more creative minds, and thus can appreciate escapism more, as they tend to tire of the mundane and social mediocrity more so than females. Though, plenty of females enjoy fantasy things.
The original was sprites, not polygons.
Poseur.
Do a search–identity of Jack the Ripper revealed. There are several sites. Apparently, a detective has been able to locate the shawl of one of the victims. There was DNA from both the victim and the killer on the shawl.
The walls were made of polygons, not sprites. Calling people poseur’s is the faggiest thing I’ve ever heard.
How did that picture of a guy wielding an ax explain anything or do some behavioral analyzin`?
I mean it’s good you are not wasting time on topics like racism but are getting into deep stuff here. I have been mulling over that photo of a serial killer from a film - much better than using real life examples - and I understand so much about the deep stuff. I feel immersed in the depths now.
Yes, humans made this. How does this demonstrate human nature. If I post a video of a guy hugging a kitty would that demonstrate human nature`?
WEll, I am sure a very tiny minority of women are.
Do you understand what a false generalization is`?
Yes, humans made this. How does this demonstrate human nature. If I post a video of a guy hugging a kitty would that demonstrate human nature`?
WEll, I am sure a very tiny minority of women are.
Do you understand what a false generalization is`?
So since women are 'obsessed with zombie stuff´we can draw the conclusion that zombie stuff is not escapist.
And you do understand that your second sentence above also contradicts the first sentence of yours above.
It’s like you say something and it makes you think of something else and you don’t even notice that the sum total of what you have said is nothing.
That sentence isn’t even contradictory. It says that males enjoy escapism more, tire of mundane and social mediocrity, and plenty of females enjoy fantasy things. Zombie games are very mundane and the quintessence of social mediocrity.
Please provide evidence that women aren’t obsessed with zombie games, horror movies, etc. Actually dont bother because its an obvious fact they are into such material.
I’ve never been into Harry Potter, zombies, or vampires. I don’t play video games, don’t watch horror flicks, and I’ve never seen an episode of Walking Dead or Twilight.
I don’t see the appeal of it- it’s kids fantasy stuff and you don’t learn anything from it. If you have free time on your hands, there is plenty of things around you, real things, that you can learn about: health, psychology, medicine, biology, geography, weather, etc. If you enjoy learning, these things can be stress relievers too.
This just proves me right. My view is that women tend to be specialists and not as well rounded as men. In your case, you are hyper-rational, ie. a boring scrooge obsessed with what he deems practical and nothing else. You suffer in the aesthetics and art appreciation department.
This is nothing I havent said before, I already said males tend to have more creative minds and thus are more attracted to fantasy and more potentially repulsed by the mundane.
As for myself, I think Harry Potter, zombies and Twilight are boring as hell, but those are art entities marketed for and catering women’s desires.
Yes, independent individual volition to kill versus authoritarian group controlled forms of killing.
Very nice. I like that. A very astute description.
Very interesting. I’ll look into it.
Simple thread aesthetics Moreno. Let’s not go overboard and debate every small issue or detail.
I would also like to add, the aesthetics in doom 4 are garbage.
Pandora, and what if the individual grew up in a nice family household and had a very peaceful childhood.
You assume the behavioral pathology is the same for all individuals yet history proves it is not.
[b]Behavioral analysis of Jack The Ripper:
It is clear that the individual was a male as it takes great strength to subdue a victim and then rip into their chest or stomach with a knife. The killer more than likely was either a butcher or familiar with human anatomy from a medical profession.
The psychological pathology of the killer shows a deep animosity or hatred of women. Why he chose to slaughter and butcher street prostitutes is unclear. Why weren’t women from other segments of society not targeted?
Perhaps he was a killer of convenience. Prostitutes are easily accesible with money and tend to be alienated socially amongst society that nobody would really care if they went missing or were killed.
We can see this anger and hatred of women where each victim exhibited facial wounds. Onto the part of ripping out various organs of the women this was a clear case of wanting a memento or souvinir. Like a hunter after his kill takes the head of his prey and mounts it on his wall for aesthetical decor.
What’s interesting is the last victim who had her uterus and heart removed. This was intentional and was a ritualistic form of killing meant to be symbolic. The intended message here was twofold. Carving out the woman’s vagina or uterus was symbolic on the part of the killer by stripping her of her femininity and womanhood.
The heart was symbolic perhaps for his inability to be loved by a woman or his disdain for them altogether.[/b]
There are two contrasting views of the criminal mind. Paul Menninger wrote, crime is everybody’s temptation, in each of us there is some criminal temptation. “The latest biological theories of crime, however, stress that criminals cannot help what they do, it is all in their genes”.
Bad men do what good men dream, Frantz Fanon, a West Indian psychiatrist, believed that a little murder did wonders for the psyche of the downtrodden. The view in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, that in each of us there is a dark side, and if we deny this it can impede our ability to know ourselves and control at times our own unacceptable impulses.
Secondly, the alternative view to the above of criminals, is that the violent criminal is really a monster, is an evil different breed to “ourselves”. This person may masquerade as normal but really is a sociopath, different from the rest. This is the view of psychiatrist Hervey M Cleckley, who wrote The Mask of Sanity. Do serial killers, primarily need to gain control, is it a dissociation from reality, the thrill of finally gaining control, or is it simply a biochemical condition.
There have been novels about such people, In Cold Blood (based on fact) and Badlands and there have been real life people who have masqueraded as normal. Harold Shipman, the physician who has the distinction of killing the most people in Britain and Michael Swango, a physician in the U.S. What are your feelings on this, do you understand and sympathize with a person’s impulse to “trespass”. Is crime everybody’s temptation and does the ability to know our dark side give us the power to control ourselves, or is the violent criminal really a monster, masquerading as normal, does the sociopath criminal really differ fundamentally in his psychological makeup. Are the criminals an evil different breed, or are they just like “us” but maybe they have lost the ability to control their impulses.
People, anyone, under the right conditions can do evil. Are people born evil or are they shaped into evil by society.
Both.