Gender Differences

Here are some spawned ideas after receiving the “women are incapable of love” thread:

Females seem to be completely subjective creatures, innately solipsistic, and mentally do not develop or “mature” past a certain point. Mentally, average males are expected and supposed to exceed females in maturity and wisdom. Although there are many emasculated, domesticated, feminine, immature men in the modern world. The real difference between male and female types, both physically and mentally, occur by the nature of the mind.

Females lack objectivity. A female does not “see beyond” or understand beyond her lifetime, her conscious existence, her feelings, her emotions. She is trapped by them, mentally. She does not “look” too far forward into the future, nor too far backward into the past. She has no metaphysical direction or willpower, or need to travel. She is content to “stay where she is”, mentally and spiritually.

Males are the creatures of “Evolution”. Males change the existence, out of need and necessity. Females do not, do not care about change, and do not want to know about change. Females are complacent and comfortable with ignorance. Females have no real desire for wisdom, or, any other objective drive. Males have objective drives and interests, “passions”, due to nature, instinct, genes, and need.

Males lack inherent power in nature.

And males accumulate this deficiency in power, objectively, not subjectively. This explains why average males are less sociable, usually anti-social, compared to females. It also explains the lack of females in intellectual areas and groups. It explains lack of female passions, regarding anything “impersonal”. Female passions are tied with “social affairs”, breeding and raising children, gossip, and every other shallow triviality.

Males are the wall, the skin, the outside of the human archetype. This is also true in other mammal species, possibly insects too.

Perhaps there are no exceptions in nature. Perhaps every male, in every specie, retains its inherent trait of Expendability. Born without value, a male must “choose” to create his own value in life. Many males fail, yes, and remain worthless. While, at the very least, an average female is born with much, much more value.

And these power differences, and differences of value, can and do reflect existence beyond the scope of human gender interactions.

I speak about the nature of all things, all life, all existence. Everything. The male–female difference represents the very first stage of “Evolution” of biology. Thus these hypotheses can and will explain conscious differences, differences of psychology, behavior, anything, and everything else.

Adult children with nice racks to hang coats on with the mentality of fourteen year olds.

I feel sorry for you guys if these are the only women you meet. I mean, I like a dumb ditsy ho as much as the next guy, and I’m a sucker for a shallow slut, but you gotta know that there are some real quality ones out there. Try and make friends with ones like that and get into their circles, then you can see that not all of them are as you describe. But I’ll warn you, it’s not easy. But the good shit never is no matter what kinds of things you’re looking at.

I’ve never met this mythological creature known as a good quality woman. Spent a great deal of many years looking for one to no avail.

I honestly don’t think they exist beyond novels.

Oh they’re real man, but like I said, you’re not gonna get one easy. A smart, attractive woman is something that a lot of people want. So it’s a real competition out there. Just think, if you were intelligent and super hot and had a vagina…would you just give that shit away?

No, like every other woman I’d charge it for quid pro quo pricing.

Honestly though I don’t equate monetary greed and materialism with intelligence but hey, whatever.

It’s not necessarily monetary. They want to live and be treated a certain way, and that’s what they trade for that affection. Also, pro bono means free.

Yeah, I meant to say quid pro quo. Half awake with sleep deprivation going on here.

Yeah, they want financial providers. Yada, yada, yada, yada…

What about the ones who have rich parents and so they don’t need anyone to take care of em? Those hot ones who drive the nice cars their dad’s bought em? Those bitches will be loving the shit out of a scrub…why is that?

I’ve got a friend who’s a doctor, fake tits, legs like a soccer player, (but not thick). She’s married to a dude who was going to learn to be a truck driver until he got too many duis. He’s also practically illiterate. I’ve got another friend that I went to college with who has her own business and is married to a guy who didn’t even get his GED.

Favorite article of mine by Forbes magazine was about how wealthy rich women were complaining about how they couldn’t find men more wealthier than themselves.

So, there’s that on your first point in that it doesn’t matter if they’re wealthy or financially rich.

Secondly, those guys either have some sort of bankroll going on or those women have some sort of disfigurement causing them to settle for much less in comparison to other women in their professions.

I dunno man. I’ve had a strange variety of women be attracted to me. Most of the serious relationships I’ve been in ended when I broke up with them. Seems like the poor girls go for money, and the rich ones go for attention. My thing is, I’ve got enough money to make a poor girl feel like I’ve got money, and if a girl, rich or poor has a hot body, I’ll give em attention. So maybe the rich ones didn’t have to work as much and could spend more time playing sports and working out and all, and so I gave em attention because I wanted that body. Who knows man? There’s all kinds of hos out there.

Another major gender difference is how females are sexually attracted to males who commit violence, maim, or even kill others (usually other men).

Females are sexually attracted to violent males, males who are willing and capable to hurt other men specifically. The evolutionary reason and cause for this, is due to a male’s ability to protect his own kind, property, and acquire resources. It is advantageous for a female to give herself (sexually) to an aggressive and dominant male. This means, a bully.

Social pretense dictates that everybody form consensus and repeat the mantra that “bullying is bad and wrong”, but, bullying gets males laid. So males are put to a test. Some of this includes the female “shit test” method, in which a female shit-tests a handsome, dominant, and attractive male. Because if a male “takes her shit” so easily, then won’t he be a bitch to other men too? And he would be. So the female, compulsive “shit test” technique is a preemptive measure for a man’s dominance and place of social hierarchy. A female looking for a mate, a male, wants to know “the place” of a male, within the state society.

Does he take shit (a bitch) or does he give shit (a bully)?

Women are hypocritical and contradicting here, in words and behavior. Women (and everybody else) repeatedly say that bullying is bad. But in reality and practice, females flock around and praise bullies. Whether they are state sponsored bullies (police) or otherwise, it doesn’t matter.

Bullying other men, gets you laid.

A quick note. Females don’t “bully” each other physically and violently, but instead emotionally and socially. Females cut into each other with rumors, lies, and whatever gossip they can dig up. A female does not hesitate to tarnish and destroy the reputation of one of her own “friends”, if it means she will be closer to the male of her affection and desire.

Covert versus Overt inner gender competition. Male sexual attraction to females is innately criminal (technically illegal to fuck a woman without her explicit permission). Female sexual attraction to males is innately innocent and free.

Nice analysis. ^^^^

If you ever watch a nature documentary of mountain rams the female ram will wait in the distance sexually ovulating while the two male rams bang each other’s brains out where she patiently waits for the victor to mate with.

Same thing with human females only instead of banging each others brains out we males have money, property, power, social influence, economics, class warfare, nation state wars, and ect to fight over.

In the background of all of that the human females lay still sexually ovulating like the ram waiting for the victors possessing all the spoils to mate with. Of course they’ll deny all of that because they don’t want men to know what really is going on in their heads or behaviors. That would complicate their whole male entrapment thing.

I agree with this post, however I would use the term “woman” and “man” rather than male or female. For some males have female minds, and some females have androgynous minds, for example Kelly Jones.

There are some females who are scientists, but they are mentally androgynous or tomboys, like the dude who found the shape of DNA.

I say you remove the women of this world, you remove the world’s problems.

Give half of the males sex-changes and leave it to Beaver.

Not true. Also I can’t stand the expression “gets you laid” in it’s myriad of forms, it’s sounds mentally retarded, smutty, banal, simple-minded, and uneloquent.

Women these days are attracted to the weakest, most wimpy, because that is what society promotes. I cannot tell you how many women dumped good honest bullies to go for the wimpy looking hipster dweeb, who is boring, socially conforming, and no personality. You see the trope all the time in movies, bullies get dumped for the weak emasculated hipster effete-looking average, un-special dweeb. Like attracts like, after all. If women are attracted to survival traits, its attraction to the ability to blend in to the herd, power through conformity, survival, safety through mediocrity.

Women go for the male who is the most social conforming. If society promotes weakness, and wimpyness, and not standing up to bullies, women find that behavior attractive. Women are attracted to bullies, but only if they do it in a “cool” and “funny” way. If you bully people, but come off as too dry, too serious, and don’t get the girls on your side, laughing with you, well it’s lost beans.

Gender Genetically

Men have the ‘XY’ chromosome. Women have the ‘XX’ chromosome.

Do not think of this as 50%-50%. Instead think of it as a range of %. Women are 100% female. But men are only 90% male, or 75%, or 50%, or 10%. In other words, some men are “more manly” than others. Each individual man is a different % or composition of male-female genes. However although men retain at least a small percentage of female genes–women have no percentage of manliness or male genes. This observation must become applied to humanity, societies, and behaviors.

It should become too obvious. Females are never “men”. But men retain at least a small degree of “female” composition. This means that men will sometimes behave like women, honestly, and other times not. This also explains the gender compulsion of females to submit to higher authority (Secular Atheist Imperial Statehood, or Church-Statehood as God). Males are more resistant and combative. Males rebel and resist against central state authority, while no female does. Not a single female has the genetic compulsion for social ‘Resistance’. Thus implies female acquiescence, as the primary and pivotal “Socializing” factor.

Females are socialistic, group-oriented, and “group-thinking”. Females are democratic, and deeply value popularity. For females, popularity is truth. If the majority believe in the existence of invisible gods, then invisible gods are real and true.

Males approach the world and existence differently, with much more complexity by comparison. The “male gene”, ‘Y’ chromosome changes things. It complicates things.

Males are the means of Evolution. Males dictate the “forward progressive” evolution of humanity, or, the “backward regressive” devolution of humanity. Males either evolve or devolve…then females are forced to follow whichever path set by men.

Men have Choice, women do not. Women are naturally followers, not leaders.

Genetic Ratios

Understanding gender by genetics, will make gender difference much more obvious, undisputed, and pronounced.

Take a human male and female. A man has ‘YX’ chromosomes. A woman has ‘XX’ chromosomes. This means that between the couple there are three female chromosomes ‘X’ and only one male chromosome ‘Y’. So ‘YX’ + ‘XX’ = “YXXX”.

What insights can be made with this observation?

Consider how genes pass from one generation to the next. A man represents his father and mother. But a woman represents only her maternal grandmothers. A woman inherits the ‘X’ chromosome of her mother’s mother, and her father’s mother.

Now apply this observation to sexuality, inheritance, sexual attraction, behaviors, and evolutionary sexual selective trends. A woman, by nature of her genes, identifies with women only. A woman does not have the genetic material of her father, but only of her father’s mother.

A daughter does not share genetic material of her father’s male biology.

This immediately explains the differences of father-son relations, versus father-daughter relations. A father forms a deeper connection with his son, as his own genetic connection, than with anybody else or any other relation.

Yes, excellent parallel