Here are some spawned ideas after receiving the “women are incapable of love” thread:
Females seem to be completely subjective creatures, innately solipsistic, and mentally do not develop or “mature” past a certain point. Mentally, average males are expected and supposed to exceed females in maturity and wisdom. Although there are many emasculated, domesticated, feminine, immature men in the modern world. The real difference between male and female types, both physically and mentally, occur by the nature of the mind.
Females lack objectivity. A female does not “see beyond” or understand beyond her lifetime, her conscious existence, her feelings, her emotions. She is trapped by them, mentally. She does not “look” too far forward into the future, nor too far backward into the past. She has no metaphysical direction or willpower, or need to travel. She is content to “stay where she is”, mentally and spiritually.
Males are the creatures of “Evolution”. Males change the existence, out of need and necessity. Females do not, do not care about change, and do not want to know about change. Females are complacent and comfortable with ignorance. Females have no real desire for wisdom, or, any other objective drive. Males have objective drives and interests, “passions”, due to nature, instinct, genes, and need.
Males lack inherent power in nature.
And males accumulate this deficiency in power, objectively, not subjectively. This explains why average males are less sociable, usually anti-social, compared to females. It also explains the lack of females in intellectual areas and groups. It explains lack of female passions, regarding anything “impersonal”. Female passions are tied with “social affairs”, breeding and raising children, gossip, and every other shallow triviality.
Males are the wall, the skin, the outside of the human archetype. This is also true in other mammal species, possibly insects too.
Perhaps there are no exceptions in nature. Perhaps every male, in every specie, retains its inherent trait of Expendability. Born without value, a male must “choose” to create his own value in life. Many males fail, yes, and remain worthless. While, at the very least, an average female is born with much, much more value.
And these power differences, and differences of value, can and do reflect existence beyond the scope of human gender interactions.
I speak about the nature of all things, all life, all existence. Everything. The male–female difference represents the very first stage of “Evolution” of biology. Thus these hypotheses can and will explain conscious differences, differences of psychology, behavior, anything, and everything else.