There may be a tie in of optical reflection into the initial child’s self recognition/self image , as postsribed as the literal reflection qua self concept, before this concept ‘refracted’ into the ‘secondary process’ of identification. The role a human being
plays eventually into utilization in ways: this is how inter action follows the intrapsychic configuration of
these earliest of images, with the required roles he
has to integrate into.
The expectation of this selfhood’s integration is
presumptive at first, by the process of trying to guess
by testing ,the ways in which these expectations may be posed. This is the introjective identification, and
the test revolves around the core process of projection
of various image contents. This is why, the test is
rarely posed in terms of self concepts, since they are
rarely, if ever posed in literal terms. The priority of the image, prevents this.
What conclusions if any, can be posed into the
philosophical sel-diagnosis of existentialism as a
border-line condition, if any? Is Attari useful at this point ,to tie into the aspects of modern European
escape (exit) from the constraints that post utopian
philosophy places on the need to escape the nihilistic
conundrum ,seemingly a virtual dead end, loaded
within it’s own inertia into this state of ‘freeze’'?
The archaic freeze of living in the reminders of an
ideal world?