So many many contradictions

So many contradictions for a purpose that is he wanted to become like khrishnamurti yes, and every facet of him had a n opposite" me that WAS me and if you add a characteristic or type to it, you become mobilized in the process a total zero-0and then nobody will love or like you because your a negative of all and all of them unsure.
?
And all of them unsure because they fear and feel the fear the great or even the greatest fear that what will it be like in an experimental world where the very bottom of fear of fearing what it will be like as an experimental freeform daring those who set it there from the beginning no fear of what just happened gone

So--------- as your striving has always been that of become of no BODY, nobody, how could anybody like You?

Mean a total nihilzation mobilization into the seeming oblivion but but but that is the very opposite of what every one wants?

Then how could you have any absolute notion of unity or Rimbaud’ spell

The invisible man unbounded will continue the progress in devaluing aberration and its nomenclature, as the fear of seeing latency or transparency on increasing negative lights.
How does evaluate this in terms of political correctness? There need some rhyme or reason to it all

Deleted lack of artistic quality

Withdrawn amateurish

The coming of invisibility , the Invisible Man. Who fears not his lack of transparency for It really is not Him.

Reich may have been right .The connection between Nietzsche’s third eye and Sartre’s eye in Being and Nothingness, between ideal forms of governance and the rule of the social proletariat becoming the cure. It is neither individual nor collective, but arises with the effects of transaction between acting in good faith, and bad.

The difference lies inthe knowledge of underlying principles, in spite of acting differently. or not. (Morality and social justice)

Acting , in good faith, does not exclude the ideal state (state as in condition, although it could also be used in the narrower derivative of venue or origin) ; just because of extemporanious societal repression and conditioning)

Note the last two paragraphs reflect simply musing on some interconnected ideas drawn in from other sources, their relevance and connection although somewhat stretched, may possess some preliminary thoughts.

Foucault, 1998, ‘Visibility is a Trap’
The Panopticon

Trotter, a long time ILP member wrote something similar back in 2005 : ‘Nietzche , Kierkegaard, Heidegger and Deleuze.’
Found it in a reference. It is essentially a much more than an exploratory reach into a very similar theme.

Bottom line: regress to the very bottom and stand it, and if it don’t kill you , and the mob understands the real meaning of survival, you become invisible and untouchable .

Walter Mattheau said something like this during his travails.

Correction : three blogs previous Sartre’s eye should read Sartre’s ‘look’.

Society and social institutions creating invisibility through society as a , prison, through synoptical and panoptical effects, increasing somatic aberration of scopophobic affects of individual perception.

That is where social modeling in free societies becomes a presumed requirement.

The understanding of this concept relates to visual thinking and the existential problem dealing with the conflicting ways that phenomenology diverged between Husserl and Sartre has everything to do with it. They were trying to solve the solipsistic Nietzchean nihilism that left a very large empty space of despair.

Sartre disallowed Husserl’s reductive phenomenology, albeit the latter’s transcendentalism, but that implied a social structural base, as a requirement, and since that consisted of social Marxism, again there developing a new empty spatial void, a deconstructed one at that which had a political segment to its causal bearing. The vast empty , soul-less paintings of Chirico bear witness to it in the post fascist Italian neo-Platonic sense.

What should determine the vision of man’s solitary way to retain that poetic sense, which some assert to be both the keustone and the motherload of consciousness of self revelation of Itself to Itself, the Dasein?

No wonder Sartre came up with the Self Learned Man, a re constructed being who constructs a faux reality based on what can be acquired from all the disposed parts , carefully labeled and reserved for some dispossessed soul?

re:
Peter Weibel: ‘Pleasure and the Panoptic Principal’- this reference connects the sub premise with Wilhelm Reich"s suppositions.

Note: there is no direct cross reference between Peter Weibel and Wilhelm Reich, its note-worthy that Peter was the publisher of a magazine named ‘Orgone’.

Peter Weibel an Austrian foremost media artist had influence on a current female media artist-filmmaker who made a deeply psychological-philosophical film titled ‘Invisible Adveraries’ , by a woman filmmaker, Suzanne Widl.
The film has taken up many of the complex themes brought up by Peter Weibel as she also belongs to that school of Austrian visual thinkers.

The themes surrounding the ideas behind such concepts as alienation, fragmentation, big brother and subsequent fears, have not by any means been resolved. On the social consciousness level of modern-postmodern society ,on the whole. efforts by the beat generation, to make inroads,by way of visual arts, uniquely introducing the ’ cut up method’ ( a visual equivalent of James Joyce"s literal
free flow literary style), have taken up the slack between literal and figurative aspects of understanding. Whether the dissolution of societal triggering responses to the dissociation of early triball-from the current modern era"s life styles(of effected faster transportational and urban.changes), retains the quandry of ferreting out truth from fiction.

what’s ahead?

Is post modernism ,-assembled from remnants of bits and pieces of deconstructed artifacts , enigmatically inspected for points of adherence and fit, approximate the value and the position of vacuous spaces resulting?

Post modernism lacking a unified vision of this backward glance, is forced to construct a faux center, resembling one with the most appeal and utility .This is where it gets tricky, and where the visual trail comes up against the intersection of. apparent phenomena , creating hybrids , resembling both: fact and fiction,.This translates into the grey area where the gap between them makes understanding indistinguisable. At this minimum juncture, the bedrock thus created( by such hybrid) becomes both: the starting and the end point from where the necessity of certain belief arises.

The split between dejure and de-facto beliefs becomes the rationale to build a faux center by necessity, creating a relative objectivism , this is where we are today , bit where are we going tomorrow? We must leave this nausea filled atmosphere of doubt and incredulity

Poor Soul!

If perchance he has the strength to develop a form, his invisibility progresses toward transparency! Which can be quite an achievement!

The transparency was obvious beforehand, even if…does not really matter.

Another closed chapter

Guys, thanks for the memories.
It matters so little in the big scheme of things.