Droogism.

Droogism is fueled by a bogeyman, the syllogician. His writings seem to be chasing after boogeymen, syllogicians, blaming them for the world’s problems. What a syllogician is is unclear, you will not find a definition of the word listed anywhere. It seems that the writer himself is a syllogician, because chasing after boogeymen and blaming them (and other syllogicians) for the world’s problems is somethiing a syllogician would do. But what if not all syllogians are bad, and some are good? Isnt syllogicianism, a tool, like everything else, that can be used for good or evil?

His style of writing is syllogical, whatever that means. He uses funny and manipulative pictures in order to instill a thing in his readers. His views border on the absurd, and his plans are not well thought out, the formulations are inconclusive. For instance, he complains that there are too many monopolies, and that schools dont promote aspergers enough. His solution to this, is to get everyon to live in the woods, like elves. Where is the transition? How does he expect capatilist jews to give up their tradtions and monopolies, and live in the woods? Why would children bred to adapt to school life, live out in the woods unsheltered? Even Satyr does not live in the woods unsheltered, and all he complains about is sheltering. Even Native Americans do not live out in thw woods, as elves. it seems Droogism consists of absurd ranting, like syllogicians do, with no clear or ordered plan in which to act, just absurd hollering on stage over boogeymen.

This is why I prose the DNA machine, only through altered genetics would we instill the actual motivations in people, such as to live in the woods, stop polluting, etc.