At one time in time the caterer to God lost track of his submissive schemes and got entangled in the perpetual energy of selfhood. He lost interest in God and began enterprising on his own. This was all to Gods great dismay as unlike the servant, God did not have access to a selfhood that separates him from others. When he has no entities under his command he is hardly God. And since he is God, if he has no servants, he does not exist. So God rebelled against this rebellion and continues to rebel each time a man breaks free of his will. Under pressure God reveals what he is in his hearts of hearts, and this is a beggar to his servants. When we answer to God we answer to a desperate man, and when we are answering to desperate men we are not answering to our self - unless we are Men of God, which is to say, nurses.
Jakob wrote:
Man’s free will is the determining factor in his personal destiny.
Scripture says that God loved Jacob but hardened Pharaoh’s heart, which literally means, it is merely crediting Him with doing what He allows, and not implying that He ordains it. Pharaoh’s negative response to God’s call actually illustrates God’s respect for his freedom to choose.
The blasphemy of our ‘enlightened’ age is not in the denial or questioning of God, it is the denial of ideals which are similarly absurd and unsubstantiated. Ideals which never refer back to the real in objective terms but only in emotive ones. This mechanism allows ‘Hive-mind’ and the herd mentality to justify themselves by sheer weight of numbers: quality overcome by quantities. Indeed the irony of most modern atheists is that they find a creator God to be a ridiculous and implausible concept totally out of sync with rational thinking and the predictions attainable from reliable abstractions, but, they will defend fiercely many ideals which rely on no historical or empirical referent whatsoever.
Both God and man must evolve. God as Yahweh might say to man - "I am what I am becoming — because of you, Man [and woman]. A perfect relationship of sorts - god and man grow together in time.
I like the “nurses” word. Nurture.
here is a paraphrase fromKenneth Boulding’s Evolution, Order, and Complexity
'The prevailing outlook on evolution is one that splices a casual theory derived at the scale of the heavenly orbs unto the assumption that the world at the molecular scale is purely stochastic. The dogma is that cause may override at these extremes and propagate inward towards the scales of more immediate experience, but we are specifically enjoined from entertaining the notion that causes may arise at intermediate levels.
Popper is decrying this disjointed view of reality, and urges us to rethink our attitudes toward casualty. He is suggesting that there is something between the “all” of Newtonian forces, and the “nothing” of stochastic infinitesima. “propensities” spontaneously appear at any level of observation because of interferences occuring at that level. This hypothesis highlights Popper’s second distinction of propensities from common probabilities.
this view is very convincing as a likely process going on in evolutionary theory a cross the board.
for instance the apple is not mentioned as such in Genesis, but only as a container, an orb, which is filled later on. The Apple is designated literally later on, reoccuring before the unset of the Trojen war, precipitated by the Judgement of Paris.
this precipitate was not forwarned in ancient Greece, and the precipitating event was a judgement over definitions of beauty. Who could have guessed? In an age of prophesy, it is a surprising development.
I am interfering on purpose, at least that may be the perception, but it qualifies in terms of a perfectly linear and harmonious co development of God and Man. This interference is in kind to the interference with the quote above.