Ego

Every manifestation of ConsciousNess contains an unknown factor, which – when known – becomes another manifestation - thus multiplicity is born. Multiplicity is the cradle of differentiation – differentiation is subject to the R/P modes - their viewpoints cause restrictions - restriction retards Selfrealisation.

Attempts to reverse this process are many and differ according to the R/P modes - but rarely seem to make it past Ego.
Ego is a close circuit that consists of 8 R/P poles with 2 viewpoints which relate the poles in a cube-like manner.
When the two viewpoints check each other, a pseudo-self-consciousness comes about that has deceived Homo in all hemispheres & ages and been the cause of most of his troubles – particularly concerning his Selfrealisation quest.

The worldwide increasing popularity of Ego is probably because its two viewpoints are used as time/space coordinates, whereas its pseudo-self-consciousness appears as a kind of unity.

“differentiation is subject to the R/P modes”

“8 R/P poles”

Could you, or someone, please explain? I googled R/P modes but drew a blank. Thanks.

Another interpretation uses Leibnitz’ argument of the indiscernibility of identity. Where an equivalence can be established between identity and ego, in the sense that Descartes used consciousness with rationality.

Epistemologically , or quantifiably, two spheres can be understood as two , even if the differentiability is not discerned, since the integration of a cube and a circle can never exactly contain each other.

Either the cube of which the volume of a sphere is derived from, or into the cube that the sphere is reduced to, can never epistemilogically and ontologically form complete identities of integration/differentiation.

Since there is no limit at which, and by which the limit that an absolute coincidence of two spheres can arrive to, it is only a pseudo conscious entity which can form an absolute basis to identity.

The ego therefore, can never become completely porous, to allow an absolute transfer from one side to the other. This is the masked man’s fallacy.

However, if the pseudo consciousness limits varies directly with more discernibility, then, functional certainty will arrive at an absolute point .
That point can be seen from dual aspects and functions of very small particles, which behave like waves at times.

E=Mc2 interprets this on the level of quantum mechanics that predicates on this level . Higher levels of psychic phenomenon, such as described in Jung’s theories of synchronic effects, may not adhere to such measurements as velocities of intra-cranial energy signals.

This is why, perhaps, individual analysis of the psyche has been abandoned in favor of multi psychic interaction.

Transcendence in object relations harbors this tool, to overcome more than merely subjective casual change.
Maybe the rate of change per brain wave velocity is slowed by traveling through physical barriers inter cranially , and gives credence to an increased rate of change after it communicates, by leaving such physical restraints of interpsychic communications, as in supernatural psychic events.

This hypothesis would account for simultaneous great discoveries by several persons.

And it adds fuel to the idea of self consciousness in a prior apprehended , non material world.

That if true, such transcendence would be able to overcome the ego threshold, that it could be conscious of a selfless identity, is a sine quo non of supporting the basis of the argument.