I have transcended

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Forum rules
Forum Philosophy

I have transcended

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Apr 17, 2018 1:59 am

> If an algorithm is infinite, there is no output, and if it's
> completely random, there is no algorithm!
>
> This is actually a very deep mathematical law!
>
> I'll explain this better.: If there is eternity, the concept is
> unmade and unchanging - it never began and never ends, it is an
> eternal platonic form. With infinity there is motion (if you cunt it
> as a whole, motions occurs)… the act of
> counting an infinity from the ether, is motion itself. Infinity =
> motion.
>
>
> It's considered a mathematical proof ala Cantor from over 140 years
> ago that all of the real numbers cannot be counted...
>
> I use a techinique called 1 dimensional flooding to show that all of
> the reals cannot be counted in one list with one dimension, which is
> differnt than Cantors diagonalization argument.
>
> use the lists..
>
> 012345678910...
> 123456789101...
> 234567891011...
> 345678910111...
> 456789101112...
> 567891011121...
> 678910111213...
>
> etc...
>
> To do one dimensional flooding, you simply add an infinite list to
> each place in the previous infinite list… plus 1
>
> 024681012151...
> 036912151821...
> 048121620242...
> 051015202530...
>
> When the list converges at infinity, there is no way to begin counting...
>
> 12345678910...
> 13579111315...
> 14812162024...
>
> Because you never pass the zero's.
>
> This is the proof that we cannot determine the limit of how much we can
> count.
>
> Sorry forgot to add the disproof of Cantor's diagonalization argument...
>
> Once you do one dimensional flooding, you have to expand to another
> dimension to keep listing the sequences... diagonals can be subsumed
> by a third dimension, say list 1.1, or list 5.7 etc... or a 4th
> dimension 1..1, 5..7, etc...
>
> It's actually easy to absorb the diagonals by starting from the center
> and listing them from top to bottom in sequence using another
> dimension... what this means is that cantors proof that you cannot
> count all the reals is FALSE!!!. It also means that you cannot find
> the limit on what can be calculated!!!!!!!!! except that it cannot be
> everything!!!!!!!!! (I'll disprove this later!)
>
> what this means, is that there are no powers to infinity, each
> dimensional flooding is just as large as another dimensional flooding,
> but they are still "uncountable" because of dimensional flooding!!
>
> My technique for sequencing the rationals.... I call it the mirroring
> technique, because i realized that if you mirror all of the natural
> numbers you have all of the decimals.
>
> The way it works is that the first ten numbers are counted just as
> themselves and their negatives:
>
> 0,1, -1,2, -2,3, -3,4, -4,5, -5,6, -6,7, -7,8, -8,9, -9
>
> Then after that you count 10 and then the next number is the mirror of
> 10, which is 01 and then you move the decimal point in once to get the
> 12th number being 0.1, then the thirteenth number (not counting the
> negatives which are numbered every other) is 0.(1 repeating). These
> steps continue until you reach three digit numbers and higher. Once
> you count 100, you then count the next number as 0.01, then 0.0(1
> repeating) then 0.(01 repeating), then you count 101 and it's mirror.
> If you keep marching in the decimal point when the number that's about
> to be mirrored ends in zero it causes infinite overlap. The number 100
> ends in a zero, so after you mirror it you only march the decimal in
> for one place to the right, if you march it two places to the right,
> you end up with 00.1, which is the same mirror that you get when the
> number 10 is mirrored, and will occur an infinite number of times as
> the zeros expand and you keep marching in the decimal point (which
> will give you infinite overlap as the sequence expands).
>
> However, if the number doesn't end in a zero, you keep marching in the
> decimal point, say the number 102. The next number is mirroring it, so
> it's 2.01, then you do the repeating decimals by next counting 2.0(1
> repeating) and then 2.(01 repeating), then you march the decimal point
> in once more to get 20.1, and then you do the repeating decimals by
> having 20.(1 repeating). (If you march the decimal in one more time,
> you get 201, and have infinite overlap as well.) Then you count the
> number 103 and then mirror it and do this forever.
>
> I also disproved Chaitin's work on infinities.... it's actually very
> simple...
>
> Disproof of Chaitin: If an algorithm is infinite, there is no output.
> If the algorithm is completely random, it's no longer an algorithm.
> Therefor... every infinite number has a finite algorithm to it that's
> shorter than that number (when dealing with infinities).
>
> I'm going to top myself and give you a law and it's implications:
>
> The set of all sets is not a subset!!! (the set of all apples is not an
> apple)
>
> Watch this !!!
>
>
> It's so easy!! It's basic set theory!!!
>
> You either have 1 or 2 or 1 and 2...
>
> 1.) 1 cannot know 2 or 1 and 2
> 2.) 2 cannot know 1 or 1 and 2
> 3.) 1 and 2 cannot know 1 or 2
>
> These are all mutually exclusive and actual!!
>
> It's a concrete disproof!!
>
> It's the same argument in terms of presence and potence ...
>
> It's impossible for any being to have an omnistate!!! For a being to
> be omniscient, it must know what we don't know, and not know it, as well as what it
> knows (everything)
>
> 5.) The Real Numbers… (Moving irrationals in sequence) (using It's Champernowne's number) (ordered! sequential! transcendental! by definition) (all irrationals)
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ………………………………………….
> ………………………………………….
> ………………………………………….
> <...312111019876543 : 345678910111213…>
> <...121110198765432 : 234567891011121…>
> <...211101987654321 : 123456789101112…>
> <...111019876543210 : 012345678910111…>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> <...111019876543210 : 012345678910111…>
> <...211101987654321 : 123456789101112…>
> <...121110198765432 : 234567891011121…>
> <...312111019876543 : 345678910111213…>
> …………………………………………...
> ……………………………………………
> ……………………………………………
> VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
>
> As my mirroring technique for counting the rational numbers expands,
> you interpolate it with this sequence for every digit (the grid
> above)…
>
> You slowly spiral out from the middle of this infinite sequence grid!
> (one axis is negatives and the perpendicular axis is decimal points)
>
> As you spiral out, you list 8 consecutive directionality's, up, down,
> right, left and all the diagonals… (these are added dimensions)
>
> This sequence will count the reals. 8 numbers added on top after each
> segment of the rational sequence.
>
> Whenever dimensional flooding occurs, you have to add a new operator
> to render it in a single list… I'm using 12 operators here to count
> the reals (that I'm not naming).
>
> You can use brute force to decrypt anything with the set of reals!!
>
> Also: View my videos by typing "Jason Teague Philosophy" on you tubes
> search engine
>
> Thank you
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: I have transcended

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Apr 17, 2018 7:50 am

I consider my best videos to be 1,2 and 9

9: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_qYeXYUyrxY
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: I have transcended

Postby URUZ » Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:45 am

5 3 13 1 14 4 21

Yeah not too bad.

The 1's are slicing through it, brutally.

531 31 144 21

5 31 31 144 3

(7)

Nice.

5+31+31+144+3 = 214

5x31x31x144x3 = 2075760

Hahahaha yeah.... digital love

Pretty funny actually.


2075760x214 = 444212640


44 432 444444


Uh oh.
EIHWAZ PERTHO NAUTHIZ

ANSUZ
User avatar
URUZ
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2015
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:14 am
Location: TrumpWorld

Re: I have transcended

Postby Ecmandu » Thu Apr 19, 2018 7:43 pm

My tenth video (comments to my other 9 videos)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SDSbR0Ee0-Y
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: I have transcended

Postby Ecmandu » Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:29 pm

My 11th Video!!

Challenge to men!!! Why men hate women!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8iklNX ... e=youtu.be
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: I have transcended

Postby MagsJ » Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:52 am

You haven't transcended, as you're still discussing the same topic that's got you in a loop.

Duplicate topics will be removed from public view..
Image
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 17160
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: I have transcended

Postby MagsJ » Mon Apr 23, 2018 2:57 am

Ecmandu wrote:My 11th Video!!

Challenge to men!!! Why men hate women!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8iklNX ... e=youtu.be

How is that a challenge, even? and you now want other men to hate women.. like you do, so that they too feel like you do about women?
Image
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 17160
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: I have transcended

Postby Ecmandu » Mon Apr 23, 2018 4:29 pm

MagsJ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:My 11th Video!!

Challenge to men!!! Why men hate women!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8iklNX ... e=youtu.be

How is that a challenge, even? and you now want other men to hate women.. like you do, so that they too feel like you do about women?


The challenge is to be a man who doesn't hate themselves for being with a woman sexually. If you want to play a game, at least play a good one, a challenging one.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am


Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]