Women with good filtering mechanisms tend to come from united families, especially ones with a dominant father-figure to scare away young males that want to poach virginity, without marrying. It’s a ‘victory’ for men to poach and take virginity without marrying. However, obviously, a dominant male/father would never allow it. A daughter’s promiscuity reflects on her poor/absent parenting.
Trump is obsessed with beauty, and doesn’t seem to care about “sloppy tenths”. If women are attractive-enough, then like I said, most men will overlook their past, just to “score” on them. Trump seems like the guy who cares about score/scoring. Trumps wives are trophy-wives. Trump is actually liberal, morally. He doesn’t have a conservative approach to his family affairs, hence the scandals and cheating. Most men, average, admire this and want to mimic it. Most men will settle quickly for a trophy-wife, looks is enough. Beauty is enough. Inner-character, intelligence, don’t matter, to them.
The “best man” is the one who took your virginity, the one who “scored” on you and then dumped you, moved on to the next woman. He was your first choice. He was your best choice. After he took your sex, then there was no reason for him to stay with you.
Possession represents nature. Once a guy takes a girl’s virginity, then he owns that forever. She/You can never get it back. You will never have as much to offer another man, afterwards. You will always offer less than your full potential. With all subsequent mates, you essentially communicate to them “you were not worth saving myself for”, “you are lesser”. You are “last pick”. Last place.
Most men suppress and repress this fact. It hurts a common man’s pride that he ignores it, and pretends like it doesn’t exist. Again, how can anybody be proud of last place, last pick?
You remember athletic games in elementary and middle school? Who were the last picks? The ones nobody wanted on their teams? Now apply that to dating, relationships, and mating. How many women and men are each-other’s last place? Having first pick, and being first pick, is ego-boosting. It builds confidence.
Despite all this idealism, I’m obliged to reality and realism. I understand that very few men can pick first, and be first picked. I accept its rarity.
When is it ever “about the woman”? Why would men care what women want, when women don’t know what you want? When you have to be told, and instructed, what to want and why? Females have a different embodiment of Privilege, than males. Women have life handed to you on a silver-platter. You have the sex. You have the supply. You have the power. But you lose that power, over time. Age, experience, decreases the sexual value of women. Women must eventually “settle-down” for last-place, the same way most men do too. So it applies to both.
It is rare that a man and woman could be each other’s first pick. It is most often that each other is Last. How many couples, relationships, humans, look at each other with disappointment? “I could have had better.” “If only I had held out a little longer?” I see these thoughts all over. It’s not me. It’s not my problem, being single. But I do see it in couples. I see it in the rate of failed marriages. I see it throughout society that nobody is happy or content. Everybody becomes each other’s last pick.
“I’m with you because I couldn’t do any better. I’m not with you because I want you.” Does this apply to you? Or your significant other?
Because it’s more forgivable for a man to cheat on his wife, or have a mistress, than it is for a woman to cheat or divorce.
Men and women are held to different standards. I’ll prove this in my next post.
As mentioned, young girls and women, who are highly selectively, almost always have a protective mother, father, or both watching over her. Her ignorance and innocence, is compensated for by the parents. This is why family-structures coincide with high-selectivity. A high-status family would be disgraced, humiliated, and worse if their daughters were revealed as town-bicycles, as easy to get, sexually. Traditionally, if a daughter has sex outside marriage, then the family will be forced down in status. Families had to be very strict to maintain their integrity. A rebellious daughter would cause disaster. This is still the case throughout the rest of the world, outside liberal-leftist USA.
Liberal-Left USA is not reality. It is the inversion of reality. Liberal-left USA attempts to convince the world, that being a whore, a slut, promiscuous women, is morally good and righteous. It is the direct opposite of reality. They push this agenda for very specific reasons and causes, ultimately, undermining and destroying the foundation and fabric of greater society. It is a degeneration, a social decay.
Hedonism.
