Sloppy Tenths

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Forum rules
Forum Philosophy

Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:21 am

I'm single and probably will remain so for awhile yet to come.

I've always been very sensitive about women's past indiscretions. It's always bothered me deeply, that women can fuck a bunch of guys then want to land a "nice" guy to support them, after they've been used up. Virgin and sexless females are the bounty. Promiscuous and loose women are repulsive. Think of it this way, all the men women let between their legs, before you, are 'better' men than you are. This has always bothered my pride. How can men have pride being "last place"?

How can you? Doesn't that make you a cuckold, to settle for second-best, or last-best? I think it does. But a lot of men are so fucking desperate and prideless, that you will accept last place than no place at all. I think, as a man, if you have pride in yourself, you would rather be no place at all than last.


Am I right or wrong?
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:25 am

I think it's worthy to chase after virgins and younger women, women who aren't used up yet.

If women are slutty and have a history then they need to do the pursuing and initiations. Because you've already given up most of your worth already.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:35 am

Women are good for more than just fucking. It's weird that you tie so much of their value to their sex lives.

On another note...if you're single and not ok with being involved with a used up slut, do you still at least participate in using up the sluts in your area? Or are you just celibate? Just asking. I mean, it's ok to bang some sluts.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25526
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:36 am

The great philosopher snoop dogg once said, "never love no ho's". So I think you've got that part right. But he also said, "it ain't no fun if the homies can't have none". Sometimes you just gotta just bang a slut then sit her out for the homies. It's ok man.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25526
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:36 am

Mr Reasonable wrote:Women are good for more than just fucking. It's weird that you tie so much of their value to their sex lives.

On another note...if you're single and not ok with being involved with a used up slut, do you still at least participate in using up the sluts in your area? Or are you just celibate? Just asking. I mean, it's ok to bang some sluts.

I think it's okay to bang some sluts. But it wouldn't make me feel better or proud of myself.

Few women are worth 'winning' or competing over. I think that women, worth fighting over, are the ones to concern about.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:42 am

I never understood the fixation that a lot of people have with trapping one. Like some people go fishing and they always catch and release. If you're a social person and you're out and about a lot and maintain a wide circle of friends and acquaintances, then it hardly makes sense to just pair off with one person and isolate yourself from a while world of stuff to do. Most couples spend a lot of time in isolation and miss out on a lot of experiences in life because of it. They become dependent on one another, and put so much of their practical stuff in life at risk on the whims of whoever they're with. The divorce rate is high. You don't wanna be tied up in that stuff. Anyway, what could 1 woman possibly offer to someone who's living an active life, who's not running low on social activities, who's not running low on sexual gratification, and who's got the freedom of a single person and thereby, in many cases the financial means to live free? Not knocking people who choose otherwise. Just saying that in my case, I'm just not sure what someone would offer me that would amount to a better deal than the one that I have.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25526
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:43 am

Like I really enjoy going out and doing nice things. Most women these days can hardly clean up enough to be taken to the fine restaurants that they say they want to be taken to. So be the guy that they all know they have to dress up for, and let them lounge around with hairy legs on their own time.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25526
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:45 am

Hypothetically, if a man and woman can form a life-bonding pair and relationship, then both benefit from it. And it's almost necessary to raise children productively, to have a definitive biological father and mother present. I think that is the necessary requirement. Having sex for fun is one thing. Having children is another.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Mar 21, 2018 8:04 am

I think that there are tons of people out there raised by just 1 parent who are doing fine. Then there's the adopted kids who have both parents and neither is biological. Then there's the ones who all end up in 1 house with 2 parents but not both parents are biological for all the kids because they're from other marriages.

Plus, you can just have nieces and nephews and send them to college and just keep having fun yourself without having to change diapers.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25526
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:18 am

Mr Reasonable wrote:I think that there are tons of people out there raised by just 1 parent who are doing fine. Then there's the adopted kids who have both parents and neither is biological. Then there's the ones who all end up in 1 house with 2 parents but not both parents are biological for all the kids because they're from other marriages.

Plus, you can just have nieces and nephews and send them to college and just keep having fun yourself without having to change diapers.

Those methods may work but they're not the best or most efficient.

In terms of lasting power, nuclear family units are the best.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby phyllo » Wed Mar 21, 2018 1:23 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:I'm single and probably will remain so for awhile yet to come.

I've always been very sensitive about women's past indiscretions. It's always bothered me deeply, that women can fuck a bunch of guys then want to land a "nice" guy to support them, after they've been used up. Virgin and sexless females are the bounty. Promiscuous and loose women are repulsive. Think of it this way, all the men women let between their legs, before you, are 'better' men than you are. This has always bothered my pride. How can men have pride being "last place"?

How can you? Doesn't that make you a cuckold, to settle for second-best, or last-best? I think it does. But a lot of men are so fucking desperate and prideless, that you will accept last place than no place at all. I think, as a man, if you have pride in yourself, you would rather be no place at all than last.


Am I right or wrong?
Are promiscuous and loose men repulsive?

Do you hold men to the same standard?
phyllo
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10962
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:41 am

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:10 pm

phyllo wrote:Am I right or wrong?
Are promiscuous and loose men repulsive?

Do you hold men to the same standard?[/quote]
The more partners a male has, he gains value. The more partners a female has, she loses value.

Quantity and Quality matter. If a male has a few, high quality conquests, then that maybe equal a dozen mediocre and below-average conquests.


Just the same, males feel better if a woman's ex-boyfriend is respectable. Many males don't mind being second-best to a better man.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby phyllo » Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:15 pm

That's just self-serving and hypocritical.
phyllo
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10962
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:41 am

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:21 pm

phyllo wrote:That's just self-serving and hypocritical.

All humanity acts this way.

Nobody really respects an easy woman. And nobody respects males that can't get laid.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby phyllo » Wed Mar 21, 2018 2:40 pm

All humanity acts this way.
No.

But even if they did, why should you? Following the crowd?
phyllo
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10962
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:41 am

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:07 pm

phyllo wrote:No.

But even if they did, why should you? Following the crowd?

Very convincing argument as to why I should pursue a promiscuous woman.....but I'll pass.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby phyllo » Wed Mar 21, 2018 3:47 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
phyllo wrote:No.

But even if they did, why should you? Following the crowd?

Very convincing argument as to why I should pursue a promiscuous woman.....but I'll pass.
I didn't say you should do that. I wouldn't even tell you what you should do. That's your decision.

I question why you have a double standard and why you think it''s reasonable to have a double standard. Your only answer is that everyone does. That seems both false and inadequate.
phyllo
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10962
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:41 am

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Serendipper » Wed Mar 21, 2018 4:59 pm

phyllo wrote:I question why you have a double standard and why you think it''s reasonable to have a double standard. Your only answer is that everyone does. That seems both false and inadequate.

I have the same double standard and have tried for years to adequately explain it to women who rarely, but sometimes, see the merits of my observations, so I'll just stick my head in the sand and continue believing I am right without any regard for justification or actual truth on the matter. That's what you do, right? You've done it to me twice now and have vowed to do it eternally more, so I feel justified in returning the favor.

There is a difference between a slut and a stud and it just is. I didn't make it that way.

Women are innately turn on by male promiscuity because it signifies a man who has desirable characteristics and men are innately turned off by female promiscuity because it signifies undesirable characteristics since loose women are calling upon their sexual powers to compensate for lack of other perceived value.

Colloquially it has been said that women want one man to fulfill her every need while men want every woman to fulfill his one need.

With cats, it makes some evolutionary sense to slut-around since a female cat can give birth to kittens of several different fathers in the same litter, but women are not so and it makes no sense to run about collecting a variety of sperm. Whereas it makes sense for a man to run about fertilizing as many eggs as possible and it makes no sense to be chained down to only one egg. That's just the way it evolved.
Serendipper
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Magnus Anderson » Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:21 pm

There is no double standard. Promiscuity is bad in both cases. The fact that men tend to be repulsed by female sluts and that women tend to be attracted to male sluts does not change that fact. What it indicates, if it indicates anything, is that men are more rational than women.
I got a philosophy degree, I'm not upset that I can't find work as a philosopher. It was my decision, and I knew that it wasn't a money making degree, so I get money elsewhere.
-- Mr. Reasonable
User avatar
Magnus Anderson
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3715
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 7:26 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Pandora » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:00 pm

UR, you are coming across as rather insecure, and finicky, and I’m speaking of your general attitude here. I see that you hold many grudges against women, but those are also reflections of yourself, and your self image in relation to women, as well.

Urwrongx1000 wrote:

Promiscuous and loose women are repulsive. Think of it this way, all the men women let between their legs, before you, are 'better' men than you are. This has always bothered my pride. How can men have pride being "last place"?

How can you? Doesn't that make you a cuckold, to settle for second-best, or last-best? I think it does.
I think this kind of victim mentality stems from ignorance of women. You are asssuming that a woman’s first is her best match, and I don’t know where you’re coming up with that kind of reasoning.
It is a kind of insecure-possessive kind of thinking from a man’s point of view.
Maybe that’s why some of these women make it a point to tell their men that they are their “best’” or at least “really good”. But then it really just points to men comparing themselves to other men and about their own self image, and not the woman herself, who is used as a means. Is the man doing it for himself or for the woman? I think it’s all about himself, and so such women also play on it. So, a man gets an ego boost and the woman...whatever- ego boost, a power trip, influence, money, etc. Maybe that’s why certain men love prostitutes and tramps, in that they get to play the reciprocal pretend game. It’s all a lie but they both feel good doing it, kind of thing. Players and sluts - smears would understand.

Also, it’s not exactly pleasant for a woman to know about all the prostitutes a man she’s with has visited in the past. At least sluts choose up the ladder, not down. You speak of women being “dirtied” by other men, but which sex is the main transmitter of stds? Who brought syphilis to Europe? And would that happen if say women were the New World explorers instead?
Also, didn’t Nietzche die of neurosyphilis because of all the prostitutes he was visiting? Not very noble for a philosophy icon!
User avatar
Pandora
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4222
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:31 am
Location: Ward 6

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Serendipper » Wed Mar 21, 2018 10:26 pm

Pandora wrote:Also, didn’t Nietzche die of neurosyphilis because of all the prostitutes he was visiting? Not very noble for a philosophy icon!


The Nietzsche scholar Joachim Köhler has attempted to explain Nietzsche's life history and philosophy by claiming that Nietzsche was homosexual. Köhler argues that Nietzsche's syphilis, which is "...usually considered to be the product of his encounter with a prostitute in a brothel in Cologne or Leipzig, is equally likely, it is now held, to have been contracted in a male brothel in Genoa."[113] Köhler also suggests Nietzsche may have had a romantic relationship as well as a friendship with Paul Rée.[114] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich ... _sexuality

I watched a video about syphilis where they concluded it's usually a harmless strain residing in the population, but mutates in cities: the better hygiene, less sharing of utensils, the wearing of clothes, means the bacteria cannot move around, so it must mutate to survive. Civilization is syphillization.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bWNF_eNwvI
Serendipper
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:39 pm

phyllo wrote:I didn't say you should do that. I wouldn't even tell you what you should do. That's your decision.

I question why you have a double standard and why you think it''s reasonable to have a double standard. Your only answer is that everyone does. That seems both false and inadequate.

Is it a double-standard that men pee standing up?

Gender is not equal, and should not be treated equally.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:48 pm

Serendipper wrote:I have the same double standard and have tried for years to adequately explain it to women who rarely, but sometimes, see the merits of my observations, so I'll just stick my head in the sand and continue believing I am right without any regard for justification or actual truth on the matter. That's what you do, right? You've done it to me twice now and have vowed to do it eternally more, so I feel justified in returning the favor.

There is a difference between a slut and a stud and it just is. I didn't make it that way.

Women are innately turn on by male promiscuity because it signifies a man who has desirable characteristics and men are innately turned off by female promiscuity because it signifies undesirable characteristics since loose women are calling upon their sexual powers to compensate for lack of other perceived value.

Colloquially it has been said that women want one man to fulfill her every need while men want every woman to fulfill his one need.

With cats, it makes some evolutionary sense to slut-around since a female cat can give birth to kittens of several different fathers in the same litter, but women are not so and it makes no sense to run about collecting a variety of sperm. Whereas it makes sense for a man to run about fertilizing as many eggs as possible and it makes no sense to be chained down to only one egg. That's just the way it evolved.

Women reject anything that reminds everybody of their depreciated value (after they've fucked around with several or a dozen guys).

Women have a vested interest in claiming they have "equal" value as back when they were virgins and untouched. I'm a "woman-hater" for bringing this topic up.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Mar 21, 2018 11:50 pm

Magnus Anderson wrote:There is no double standard. Promiscuity is bad in both cases. The fact that men tend to be repulsed by female sluts and that women tend to be attracted to male sluts does not change that fact. What it indicates, if it indicates anything, is that men are more rational than women.

No it's not a double-standard.

Men find promiscuous women repulsive. Women find sexless men repulsive. There is no double-standard on sexual value. The more partners a woman has, the less value she has. The more partners a man has, the more value he has.

Quality is a factor too, obviously. A man who has a few, high-quality women, is doing better than a man who has a dozen average and below-average women.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: Sloppy Tenths

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Mar 22, 2018 12:04 am

Pandora wrote:I think this kind of victim mentality stems from ignorance of women. You are asssuming that a woman’s first is her best match, and I don’t know where you’re coming up with that kind of reasoning.

Women can be judged by your first sexual partners. If young women let scummy, loser types of guys fuck them, then this indicates your quality, and whether you are worth pursuing or not. It signifies the quality of your filtering mechanism.

Think of it in terms of marriage, making a family, and having children. What kind of man would want to look at his wife, and know, that she's the town bicycle? Or that she's fucked some pretty low, scum types of guys?

Your sexual discretion, as a woman, is a primary means of judging you, your character, and your intellect. A smart woman, hypothetically, will have very high standards of men, and will only entertain the flirtations of "the best" types of men.

That's my point. And you agree with me. So don't pretend that you're not.


Pandora wrote:It is a kind of insecure-possessive kind of thinking from a man’s point of view.

Men do possess women. Are you not the property of your husband? Or does any man have rights to you? Can any man sleep with you? No? Then, again, don't pretend you're disagreeing with me.


Pandora wrote:Maybe that’s why some of these women make it a point to tell their men that they are their “best’” or at least “really good”. But then it really just points to men comparing themselves to other men and about their own self image, and not the woman herself, who is used as a means. Is the man doing it for himself or for the woman? I think it’s all about himself, and so such women also play on it. So, a man gets an ego boost and the woman...whatever- ego boost, a power trip, influence, money, etc. Maybe that’s why certain men love prostitutes and tramps, in that they get to play the reciprocal pretend game. It’s all a lie but they both feel good doing it, kind of thing. Players and sluts - smears would understand.

Obviously women try to, or do convince the "sloppy tenths" that "you're the best guy by far". It's a lie. But most men have a weak ego and will buy into it. Most men, being desperate, will settle for sloppy-tenths. According to the rationale of most males, "better last then nothing at all". But according to Pride, I reject that reasoning. Why not go for more? Why not do better than sloppy-tenths?

Most men, having low standards and low quality, will settle for less though.


Pandora wrote:Also, it’s not exactly pleasant for a woman to know about all the prostitutes a man she’s with has visited in the past. At least sluts choose up the ladder, not down. You speak of women being “dirtied” by other men, but which sex is the main transmitter of stds? Who brought syphilis to Europe? And would that happen if say women were the New World explorers instead?
Also, didn’t Nietzche die of neurosyphilis because of all the prostitutes he was visiting? Not very noble for a philosophy icon!

Irrelevant.

If women really cared about sexual disease and male promiscuity, then you would simply not have sex with promiscuous men. But most women cannot deny a promiscuous man, and I don't mean buying prostitutes, but easily seducing women.

Here's the rule. Most women, especially western women (including you), would rather have a stud (fucked a dozen high-quality babes) than a loser, a sexless male. This also drives the single-mother phenomenon. Women would rather be single-mothers, have the children from studs, than be stuck in a relationship or relationship with a lesser man. Women absolutely detest the sexless-male, beta-male.

So no, you and the others are completely wrong about "double-standards" here.


And it has nothing to do with personal resentment. I have had several successes with women, and several failures. I'm content with my personal life. But concerning who to chase after, as mentioned, I find it repulsive the thought of sloppy-tenths. I refuse to be last place. And more men throughout the western world should also refuse. Have some pride and dignity. Higher quality of men requires higher quality of women. A high-quality woman is one difficult to seduce and win-over. She won't have many sexual partners, as average women (like you) do.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1230
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Next

Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users