Do you believe in equality under the law for women and gays?

Do you believe in equality under the law for women and gays?

I do for gays but not for women and children.

When it comes to women and children, I think men are duty bound to put family duty and responsibilities above themselves and thus men should not consider themselves as equal to women and children.

Think in terms of the good logic of the law of the sea being applied to land.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL

Why should sodomizing another or being sodomized give a person special rights?

And women have always had more rights than men. Females are the privileged gender. What’s easier and funner in life than to stay at home everyday and raise children? Piece of cake, just for being born female.

Always!

Have they always had the same right to vote as men?

In case you do not know, the answer is no.

I thus refute your claim.

Regards
DL

No, it doesn’t. The law agrees with me, currently anyway. Are homosexuals queer when they’re born? At 3 years old? A boy knows that he’s going to be a sodomite, someday? Wants to become a sodomite when he’s older? And transexuals, eunuchs? Does a 3 year old boy know, yet, that he wants to or ought to castrate himself, someday? The law would need to first argue that sexual deviants are “born this way” before granting such “naturally endowed rights” as “Equality”.

All in all, modern day “social justice” concerning male sexuality, is perverted and corrupt. Society is sexualizing children, pedophilia. Telling children that they can “be gay” and “be trans” equally. That’s just wrong, in my opinion. Introducing such concepts to children, like sodomy, that needs to be struck out of kindergarten and elementary classrooms. But liberal-leftists, marxists, socialists, and communists want to press it forward. Want to push and peddle smut.

Teach the children that their sodomite parents, “two gay dads”, is “perfectly acceptable, normal, tolerable”. It forces the idea of sodomy, butt sex, into places where it does not belong to begin with. That’s always the implication when it comes to homosexuality. Or castration to transexuality. Homosexuality, specifically, is about sodomy, one male penetrating another male’s anus. Transexuality, specifically, is about castration and modern eunuchry. Both are anti-male, against males. These ideologies benefit some people, but not others.

It’s like poisoning the well of a village.

Voting is an obligation and a responsibility, in my opinion. Those who are most responsible, for themselves, for their families, for their society, should be the ones to vote. Voting should be based on moral strength. The “vote” of a mentally ill or diseased person should not be “equal” with that of a wise, knowing, righteous, good leader, who cares about the rest of society. Democracy is flawed in this way, to count equally the voice of the degenerate with the saint.

Voting is an obligation and a responsibility, in my opinion. Those who are most responsible, for themselves, for their families, for their society, should be the ones to vote. Voting should be based on moral strength. The “vote” of a mentally ill or diseased person should not be “equal” with that of a wise, knowing, righteous, good leader, who cares about the rest of society. Democracy is flawed in this way, to count equally the voice of the degenerate with the saint.
[/quote]
A more honest man would have recanted as the issue was you saying women always had more fights than men.

You did not have the good grace to recant so deflected.

I will deal with your gay comments separately.

Regards
DL

This is nearly incoherent. I asked you a question and you respondent with more questions and basically garbage.

We are talking equality and the law. Not What children think.

Please write a coherent on topic reply to the O.P. and I will be happy to deal with your discrimination without a just cause.

Let me add just one thing. You seem to be indicating, if I read your incoherence right, is that being gay is from child rearing. Are you indicating that we should discriminate against gays who are gay because of their upbringing instead of punishing those who raised them to be gay? If not, just what are you suggesting?

Regards
DL

[list]“Equality under the law” does NOT mean “equal by law”.[/list:u]

You dodged my question first. You should answer mine before asking your own. Here is my question a second time:

I’ll provide a free lesson about the law too.

In the u.s. and in some other western democratic liberal countries, laws protect “naturally endowed rights”, such as the hypothetical “right to and for equality” that “all are born equal under the law”, which I personally reject, but it’s beside the point. To then claim that homosexuals are “equal by law” implies that homosexuals are born as such. That homosexuality is an extension of the nature of people or individuals. That’s inherent within the claim, that there is “equality by birth-rite”.

So what part of sodomy is birth-rite, or has to do with being born??? How is homosexuality other than a lifestyle Choice, perverse in my opinion, but a “Choice” nevertheless? That some males choose buggery and pursue it with each-other. This is all implicit with your original post.

Which category do you put lesbians in since they are in both groups

Yes why should men be given special rights just for fucking women up the arse

And the women as well for being fucked up the arse

Eh, thanks for showing what you mean and the difference.

Very enlightening.

Regards
DL

I do not see a special right written in the law.

What special right do I get if I give you the big bone buddy?

What prize do you get for opening wide and giving me a wide happy grin?

Regards
DL

If we are all born so unequally under the law, how many classifications do you have in your paradigm and are they all based on your fixation with anal orifices?

How about gays who only blow each other or women who have nothing to penetrate each other with? Are they as low as gays who use sodomize.

What about heterosexual couples who also use sodomy for pleasure?

Regards
DL

You are aware, I am sure, how gays have been persecuted, jailed and murdered over time to when the rest of us decided to become civilized and recognize their right to be what we now believe nature made them.

Tell us your logic and reason as to why, given the choice, gays in the past as well as today would decide to abuse the social position and privilege of being first class citizens to become second class citizens or whatever lower class you think they now should occupy?

IOW, why would a person intentionally shoot himself or herself in the foot?

Regards
DL

I do not see the sexual habits of a female when I look at her neither do I see the sexual habits of a man when I look at him.

What I said of women stands on it’s own just as what I said of men.

Can you see a ships captain believing all the cowards who would claim being gay so as to get first dibs on a lifeboat seat.

Can you see the rest of the men not throwing those cowards overboard?

Regards
DL

First, I am against victimization. So many times I witness liberal-leftists, and many others, using gays or others as shields to their own ends. It’s not that a liberal actually “cares for” the welfare or well-being of a homosexual, or any other, but rather that expressing support for “the cause” is righteous. Is it righteous? Or is it wrong? What is so defensible about homosexuality? What is it about sodomy that ought to produce “Gay Pride” rather than shamefulness? As if a society ought to bring sex onto the streets, and make a parade about it? Or teach it to children? I’m against all that.

Secondly, I’m against this idea of “sexual nature” that this or that person is “born gay”. The onus is upon you, and others with a similar mindset, to prove that sexuality, sex acts, attraction, are all “naturally imbued”. Or is it taught or learned? Is it not forced upon children to “tolerate” such things as homosexuality and homosexual behaviors? The young child asks, “where do babies come from?” so what is the answer?

From in vitro fertilized frozen eggs from 50 year old women, raised in a lab, inserted temporarily into a young woman’s womb, then born into an adoption agency, and peddled to the nearest “homosexual couple”, all in the name of Progress.

And why? To what end? What are the motivations?

If you truly want “equality for gays” then the challenge is on you to prove your points “for equality”.

Why should a heterosexual couple, traditional marriage, nuclear family, be “equal” with two males seeking gay hedonistic ends? Where is the equality? Where and why does “the law” become involved?

Again, my question to you become your questions to me.

Rather a one way conversation that that looks like you do not have to justify your position but that I always have to keep justifying mine.

Give me a decent answer on the actual topic of this post or you can just go find a big one to shove where your fixation is.

Regards
DL

To use fraud, garner sympathy, and collect disability welfare payments.

Look at this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Munchausen_syndrome

In the days when being gay meant jail, there can be no wanting to gain sympathy or welfare payment.

If that is your best, it is no wonder you ignored my other question.

Are we done or will you now discuss like a normal person would and go back and answer my questions to you with answers instead of questions.

I am willing but you have to do you part first.

Regards
DL