Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Forum rules
Forum Philosophy

Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:53 pm

Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

When Nietzsche proposed the notion ‘beyond good and evil’, saying it in those terms proposes problems which I think he knew and hence didn’t publish. Some interpret that as meaning it is ok to be evil or not good, but I’d like to have a bash at another way of looking at it…

If you push in any direction, the world will pull in an equal and opposite direction. Even less than that, sometimes the world will generate a different path which exists as if irrespective of the force or otherwise the way one pushes a thing or idea into the world.
Take for example the EU and brexit; the EU was akin to a chariot running rough-shod over everything in its path. It thought it was pursuing the right path [and probably was], but its force was pushing and so eventually manifest its opposite which disguised itself in such a way to not present itself as the opposite [racist/prejudice]. So either way neither side is good/evil, they are instead different instances of forces and ideas pushing in different directions.

Another example; yesterday on the news someone said how women in Sweden get time out to give birth etc, and can then go straight back into their prior positions. Yet in Britain women don’t get the same chances at least not to the same degree - the same amount of freedom one could say. Someone on the opposite side of the fence might say that, women should be mothers or otherwise that men have their roles and women have theirs which are different things. Women may not be as good as men at certain things [like in almost all sports], but are better in many other areas such as caring, and show the more salient side of mankind’s nature.

These may not be the best examples, but I feel that the world does pull in different directions, and if you do push in any area you will manifest alternate ‘forces’. as a thinker and inventor [currently working on surrogate robots and exoskeleton catsuits [I’ve given up on the flying car lol]], I know that inner forces which have potential for change will have an internal and external effect. People just react differently and an inner conflict is manifest from the outset. So as soon as you start thinking of a way to change the world or make changes et al, forces start swirling in the mind and in the world almost as if there is not gap nor division between the two. ‘The Prometheus effect’ as I call it, means that your outgoing force manifests an equal and opposite force in both your mind and the world, and hence your whole life changes. Artist go through ‘the artistic process’, as do entrepreneurs and even chef’s, all of which is the same thing - Konflict.

Does the universe have an all seeing eye? If yes, it would observe all things and yet we know from relativity that nothing is observed universally. Can you or anything envision everything? No of course not, in fact there is fundamentally a perceptual blindness throughout all existence, such that the universe cannot entirely know itself. This I feel is part of the base of all things, and that duality is the engine of creation. Yet no, I am not fundamentally a dualist; if you put all personhood and all things into the cosmic blender, you get no personhood and no things, ergo the fundament is oneness and yet it contains the said duality [as represented by the blender].

_
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Mon Apr 03, 2017 9:43 am

Amorphos wrote:Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

When Nietzsche proposed the notion ‘beyond good and evil’, saying it in those terms proposes problems which I think he knew and hence didn’t publish. Some interpret that as meaning it is ok to be evil or not good, but I’d like to have a bash at another way of looking at it…

If you push in any direction, the world will pull in an equal and opposite direction. Even less than that, sometimes the world will generate a different path which exists as if irrespective of the force or otherwise the way one pushes a thing or idea into the world.
Take for example the EU and brexit; the EU was akin to a chariot running rough-shod over everything in its path. It thought it was pursuing the right path [and probably was], but its force was pushing and so eventually manifest its opposite which disguised itself in such a way to not present itself as the opposite [racist/prejudice]. So either way neither side is good/evil, they are instead different instances of forces and ideas pushing in different directions.

Another example; yesterday on the news someone said how women in Sweden get time out to give birth etc, and can then go straight back into their prior positions. Yet in Britain women don’t get the same chances at least not to the same degree - the same amount of freedom one could say. Someone on the opposite side of the fence might say that, women should be mothers or otherwise that men have their roles and women have theirs which are different things. Women may not be as good as men at certain things [like in almost all sports], but are better in many other areas such as caring, and show the more salient side of mankind’s nature.

These may not be the best examples, but I feel that the world does pull in different directions, and if you do push in any area you will manifest alternate ‘forces’. as a thinker and inventor [currently working on surrogate robots and exoskeleton catsuits [I’ve given up on the flying car lol]], I know that inner forces which have potential for change will have an internal and external effect. People just react differently and an inner conflict is manifest from the outset. So as soon as you start thinking of a way to change the world or make changes et al, forces start swirling in the mind and in the world almost as if there is not gap nor division between the two. ‘The Prometheus effect’ as I call it, means that your outgoing force manifests an equal and opposite force in both your mind and the world, and hence your whole life changes. Artist go through ‘the artistic process’, as do entrepreneurs and even chef’s, all of which is the same thing - Konflict.

Does the universe have an all seeing eye? If yes, it would observe all things and yet we know from relativity that nothing is observed universally. Can you or anything envision everything? No of course not, in fact there is fundamentally a perceptual blindness throughout all existence, such that the universe cannot entirely know itself. This I feel is part of the base of all things, and that duality is the engine of creation. Yet no, I am not fundamentally a dualist; if you put all personhood and all things into the cosmic blender, you get no personhood and no things, ergo the fundament is oneness and yet it contains the said duality [as represented by the blender].

_


Amorphos ... me thinks you are out in front of the crowd on this topic as well ... way out in front. :-)

Scale back your use of the word "world" to illustrate your point ... to family. I have experienced what you wrote about several times within my family ... extended family.

Experienced it in a remote/isolated community of about 300 people where the safety and welfare of the community was my job ... safety and welfare of the community ... not a select group within the community. The reaction was not only rapid ... it was vicious ... mostly in the emotional/psychological plane of existence. I was literally forced out of the community after less than 4 months.

Behavioral scientists would likely attribute my experiences to the "group think" phenomenon. I agree ... yet ... do we totally understand the mechanics and underpinnings of this phenomenon? What about the implications involving the psychic realm?
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:36 pm

Experienced it in a remote/isolated community of about 300 people where the safety and welfare of the community was my job ... safety and welfare of the community ... not a select group within the community. The reaction was not only rapid ... it was vicious ... mostly in the emotional/psychological plane of existence. I was literally forced out of the community after less than 4 months.


Wow that’s interesting. I can’t imagine you as the sort of chap who would get a reaction like that, but there you go eh. Perhaps it is something like how the police get bricks thrown at them for interfering, or on the opposite side of the coin, like how civilians in new Orleans kinda looked at the cops as the enemy, because they didn’t feel they got the same help as if it were an upper-class white neighborhood. Sometimes cops can seem like an invading army, and act like it too. That’s a power thing, same as why american prisons are so full and why entrapment is used.

The group-think phenomenon is perhaps a measure of how much reaction/effect your force or pushing gets - even when it is an attempt to help.
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby encode_decode » Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:01 am

Very cool writing Amorphos

I might have to read Nietzsche after I finish with Hume.

Amorphos wrote:If you push in any direction, the world will pull in an equal and opposite direction.
I am wondering here whether you are saying the world is pulling in both equal and opposite directions at the same time. Essentially meaning the end result of your pushing could go either way. Either the way you wanted it or the opposite.

Amorphos wrote:I know that inner forces which have potential for change will have an internal and external effect. People just react differently and an inner conflict is manifest from the outset. So as soon as you start thinking of a way to change the world or make changes et al, forces start swirling in the mind and in the world almost as if there is not gap nor division between the two.
Deep stuff. Do you think the inner conflict is always present? I have an idea that it is.

I am interested in seeing "Konflikt" as a root philosophy. I agree with pilgrim-seeker_tom on this one:
pilgrim-seeker_tom wrote:Amorphos ... me thinks you are out in front of the crowd on this topic as well ... way out in front. :-)


. . . and like I said to begin with:

Very cool writing Amorphos
It’s not that truth itself is being eroded per se, it’s that fragmental falsification appears to be increasing.
(Anomaly654 - 2017)

But the point remains that you can't get at that meaning before grasping the surface meaning
- which is to say there is always meaning.

(gib - 2017)

Mind is an ever changing dimension that is bound to reality, logic and emotion.
(Myself - 2017)
User avatar
encode_decode
Thinker
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:07 pm
Location: Metaspace

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Only_Humean » Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:38 am

It sounds an awful lot like Hegel's thesis/antithesis process to me :)
Image

The biology of purpose keeps my nose above the surface.
- Brian Eno
User avatar
Only_Humean
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:53 am
Location: Right here

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Tue Apr 04, 2017 1:22 pm

Only_Humean wrote:It sounds an awful lot like Hegel's thesis/antithesis process to me :)


If I understand Hegel correctly ... just finished the 20 minute google tour :-) ... Hegel proposed the thesis/antithesis process would lead to a higher consciousness.

About 2 centuries have passed ... how do you assess the "higher consciousness" of today versus the "consciousness" of Hagel's day?

Suppose many would argue that substantial progress in consciousness/awareness is self evident ... requiring no further comment.

OTH ... a cursory glance at Hegel's world ... Napoleon et al ... and a cursory glance at recent geopolitics ... suggests not much has changed ... seems Hegel's notion of higher consciousness fails to translate into higher/heightened social harmony ... certainly not at a global level.

Let's hope Amorphos et al are headed in a different direction than Hegel.
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Only_Humean » Tue Apr 04, 2017 2:09 pm

I'm no fan of Hegel, and his philosophy of polar opposition has been at the political root of many of the most destructive governments of the 20th century. But by what terms or metrics are we no further than societies then? Literacy, life expectancy, global awareness, social mobility, equality, risk of death from war, disease, childbirth... I'll take today, thank you.
Image

The biology of purpose keeps my nose above the surface.
- Brian Eno
User avatar
Only_Humean
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6193
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:53 am
Location: Right here

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby James S Saint » Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:47 pm

Amorphos wrote:If you push in any direction, the world will pull in an equal and opposite direction.

If you push [too much or too fast] in any direction...
Or if you push against life itself, life will push you back.
It is an issue of Impedance Mismatching.

Amorphos wrote:Yet no, I am not fundamentally a dualist; if you put all personhood and all things into the cosmic blender, you get no personhood and no things, ergo the fundament is oneness and yet it contains the said duality [as represented by the blender].

_

There can be no universe at all without difference. Absolute homogeneity is physically and logically impossible. The "fundament" of existence is difference (hence "konflikt"].
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:04 pm

Readers ... seems the term "Root Philosophy" has tickled my curiosity. My memory coughed up the Biblical myth in Genesis. In particular the first two people ... portrayed in the myth ... post Garden of Eden.

The two brothers Cain and Abel ... the first two people in the 'real' world ... again post the Garden of Eden ... the non 'real' world ... part of the myth.

Abel tried to do good ... triggered a conflict with his brother Cain ... cost Abel his life.

Also reminds me of something my Greek friend told me many years ago ... something to the effect that according to the Greeks ... there is "truth" embodied in myth ...ergo: myths are not solely for entertainment.

Perhaps there is a "message" embodied in the Cain and Abel myth.

I find the parallels to the notions introduced by Amorphos astonishing.
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby James S Saint » Tue Apr 04, 2017 4:09 pm

pilgrim-seeker_tom wrote:Perhaps there is a "message" embodied in the Cain and Abel myth.

That was a story about sheparding people (mild usury) vs farming people (total usury) and the consequences.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:29 am

James S Saint wrote:
pilgrim-seeker_tom wrote:Perhaps there is a "message" embodied in the Cain and Abel myth.

That was a story about sheparding people (mild usury) vs farming people (total usury) and the consequences.


Readers ... the implications in James's above comment may embody a fascinating revelation.

How so?

James implies that myth's are born of a priori human experience ... rather than being the fruit of someone's armchair psychology or imagination.

Perhaps Homer's Iliad and Odyssey are good examples ... for the longest time they were considered pure myth ... by some people at least ... of late some scholars suggest they include some historical fact.

Back to Jame's post:

That was a story about sheparding people (mild usury) vs farming people (total usury) and the consequences.


What exactly was the a priori human experience embodied in the above statement? Where did this human history occur ... what geography?

My memory coughed up some recent stuff I read claiming the Biblical Genesis myth was written by a woman.

If true, my guess would be the human history embodied in the myth took place in Egypt.
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:01 am

There can be no universe at all without difference. Absolute homogeneity is physically and logically impossible. The "fundament" of existence is difference (hence "konflikt"].


Plausible enough.

What about the theory of "The Process of Biotic Homogenization" applied to the human species?
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:11 am

I am wondering here whether you are saying the world is pulling in both equal and opposite directions at the same time. Essentially meaning the end result of your pushing could go either way. Either the way you wanted it or the opposite.

well it was more like newtons third law, but I mostly agree. at least the principle exist by which said law and the prometheus effect both work. Same in the Tao where you have the dragon as masculine and the serpent as feminine, this represents an eternal duality constantly churning things up, to wit there will be a flow of the Tao like winds through everything.

Do you think the inner conflict is always present? I have an idea that it is.


Absolutely.

About 2 centuries have passed ... how do you assess the "higher consciousness" of today versus the "consciousness" of Hagel's day?


What a good question! I think people were relatively duller in the past - on the whole. Well we came from monkey consciousness. The greater knowledge makes a more intelligent person imho. Equally the greater the experience and so on and so forth. I digress; the greater the pool of information, means that a greater duality has occurred. Said duality is the engine of creation, ergo if the repertoire is expanded we are simply increased in some way by that volume.
- consider why Alexander could build factories making pipes, and yet an industrial revolution didn’t follow. You simply need a whole ton of inventions and ideas which may then culminate as the explosion that has occurred over the last two centuries. The blast furnace for example.

There can be no universe at all without difference. Absolute homogeneity is physically and logically impossible. The "fundament" of existence is difference (hence "konflikt"].


Conflict is a >fundamental >>principle<<<. whereas reality is the ‘stone’ being acted upon.

Hmm yes ok I suppose that both are involved equally means fundamental to that is still Konflikt/duality. …but why then can we not say that there can be oneness and there cannot be oneness and both be true?

_
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby encode_decode » Wed Apr 05, 2017 3:30 am

Words
Amorphos wrote:the greater the pool of information, means that a greater duality has occurred. Said duality is the engine of creation, ergo if the repertoire is expanded we are simply increased in some way by that volume.
I have been waiting to hear for a long time.
It’s not that truth itself is being eroded per se, it’s that fragmental falsification appears to be increasing.
(Anomaly654 - 2017)

But the point remains that you can't get at that meaning before grasping the surface meaning
- which is to say there is always meaning.

(gib - 2017)

Mind is an ever changing dimension that is bound to reality, logic and emotion.
(Myself - 2017)
User avatar
encode_decode
Thinker
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:07 pm
Location: Metaspace

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:04 am

You simply need a whole ton of inventions and ideas which may then culminate as the explosion that has occurred over the last two centuries. The blast furnace for example.


Hmmm!

reminds me of the Egyptian Civilization at it's peak. Apparently not only the construction of the pyramids is held in awe by modern engineers ... the alignment of them even more so.

What happened to the reservoir of "inventions and ideas" that empowered this particular feat?

Perhaps that is what James was referring to with his comment:

That was a story about sheparding people (mild usury) vs farming people (total usury) and the consequences.


... particularly the words ... "and the consequences"
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby James S Saint » Wed Apr 05, 2017 4:37 pm

Amorphos wrote:Conflict is a >fundamental >>principle<<<. whereas reality is the ‘stone’ being acted upon.

Hmm yes ok I suppose that both are involved equally means fundamental to that is still Konflikt/duality. …but why then can we not say that there can be oneness and there cannot be oneness and both be true?

_

Difference,
division,
interaction,
trade,...

are all necessary to existence. But "Conflict" is only an aberrant emergent consequence of such necessary elements, although extremely difficult to avoid. The more one understands trade, impedance matching, and life, the less conflict arises. War is only the consequence of naivety and lust.
Clarify, Verify, Instill, and Reinforce the Perception of Hopes and Threats unto Anentropic Harmony :)
Else
From THIS age of sleep, Homo-sapien shall never awake.

The Wise gather together to help one another in EVERY aspect of living.

You are always more insecure than you think, just not by what you think.
The only absolute certainty is formed by the absolute lack of alternatives.
It is not merely "do what works", but "to accomplish what purpose in what time frame at what cost".
As long as the authority is secretive, the population will be subjugated.

Amid the lack of certainty, put faith in the wiser to believe.
Devil's Motto: Make it look good, safe, innocent, and wise.. until it is too late to choose otherwise.

The Real God ≡ The reason/cause for the Universe being what it is = "The situation cannot be what it is and also remain as it is".
.
James S Saint
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 25609
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby pilgrim-seeker_tom » Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:13 am

War is only the consequence of naivety and lust.


Awesome insight James :D

Even supports ... though I suspect unintentionally ... the thesis Amorphos posits.

A domestic dispute is war.

Making "naivety and lust" ... ergo: war ... as necessary a component of human life as food and water.

Ergo: Konflict - as a root philosophy.
"Do not be influenced by the importance of the writer, and whether his learning be great or small; but let the love of pure truth draw you to read. Do not inquire, “Who said this?” but pay attention to what is said”

Thomas Kempis 1380-1471
User avatar
pilgrim-seeker_tom
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 11:16 am

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Thu Apr 06, 2017 2:50 am

reminds me of the Egyptian Civilization at it's peak. Apparently not only the construction of the pyramids is held in awe by modern engineers ... the alignment of them even more so.

What happened to the reservoir of "inventions and ideas" that empowered this particular feat?


I think people like the ancient Greeks, Chinese, Indian, Persians and Egyptians etc, done as much as could be done at that time, and with the instruments they had. There was no concept of mass production, machine tools etc, but in later times they had colored glass, so must have had some manner of blast furnace. The geometry is I think an art-form, much like how many cultures mapped the sky to roads and hilltops. Maybe they tune into magnetism too, I can’t think of any other way they could do it [aside from magic]. druids I think used divining rods for example.
Point is though, there are around 98% more things in the modern world - if we go by the invention count since the industrial revolution.

Consider that in simplest form all I am saying is that; more does equal more, and that will be mathematically cumulative.

----------------------------------------
are all necessary to existence. But "Conflict" is only an aberrant emergent consequence of such necessary elements, although extremely difficult to avoid. The more one understands trade, impedance matching, and life, the less conflict arises. War is only the consequence of naivety and lust.


War is also the consequence of not being naive about the realities of the world. …but I didn’t mention that konflikt meant that, I was trying to state that everything is in juxtaposition like a balance. This is not on the periphery but is at the core of anything one cares to put up against it. All physical things, all info and all meaning contains a duality, even the meaning of oneness.


_
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby encode_decode » Mon Apr 10, 2017 3:24 am

Something extremely difficult to solve with logic alone - I make no attempt to solve it here - I more or less just accept it.
Amorphos wrote:if you put all personhood and all things into the cosmic blender, you get no personhood and no things, ergo the fundament is oneness and yet it contains the said duality [as represented by the blender].
The fundament is oneness - the duality is oneness - this itself is even a rather contrary intuition. Without the said duality there is simply nothing to compare and with a simple extension "no life". You need a contrast for anything to exist - You are you and everything else is "not-you" and therefore the "YOU" is dependent on the "not-you"; oneness and twoness - twoness is oneness. I think it is safe to assume that Konflikt does make a good root philosophy. I think a grounding philosphy is going to contain a lot more than just Konflikt but I think Konflikt serves as the prop for the rest of a grounding philosophy.

I hope what I write is making sense - I had to deal with a lot of interruptions whilst writing this post.

:-k
It’s not that truth itself is being eroded per se, it’s that fragmental falsification appears to be increasing.
(Anomaly654 - 2017)

But the point remains that you can't get at that meaning before grasping the surface meaning
- which is to say there is always meaning.

(gib - 2017)

Mind is an ever changing dimension that is bound to reality, logic and emotion.
(Myself - 2017)
User avatar
encode_decode
Thinker
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:07 pm
Location: Metaspace

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Mon Apr 10, 2017 11:20 pm

The fundament is oneness - the duality is oneness - this itself is even a rather contrary intuition.


The duality is a principle acting upon the oneness! 2 cannot be the origins, it has to be 1 [or 0].

If each self has a oneness at root, that’s a multiplicity - which is a contradiction. The emptiness the self begins with may well be universal [almost certainly is], in other words its all the same thing in beginnings. What I [person x] began with and what you [person y] began with is the same thing, the same oneness which gradually gains focus and comes into being as an individual at birth.

We are all rabbits pulled out of the same hat.
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby encode_decode » Tue Apr 11, 2017 12:17 am

If each self has a oneness at root, that’s a multiplicity - which is a contradiction.

What if all the required oneness is there to begin with? There would be no multiplicity just things that take part in the oneness. Couldnt the oneness be infinite?

If duality is a principle then it could be that it is the oneness that is contrasting each thing.

I am not necessarily disagreeing - just trying to understand.

So if I say instead that all totality is; is a fundamental substance(lets call the substance "strings"); when there is nothing but strings then the full state of oneness is zero; because no matter how many times you add zero you still get zero. Then when something is configured with strings then it becomes a contrasting figure against the rest of totality. Duality enters the picture to begin with through this first creation. If this is to be true then there are other principles that have to be for things to configure in the first place - maybe attraction of strings.

Maybe the primordial principles(strings) are consuming and producing. I know the cosmic blender is just a device to present an idea as are some of the devices I have created in this post but it does make me wonder how it can be that the fundament became separated from the rest of totality in the first place. Are you saying the blender sits inside nothing? and you have taken everything inside the said nothing and put it inside a blender. Where did the blender come from?

This is more a curiosity than anything.
It’s not that truth itself is being eroded per se, it’s that fragmental falsification appears to be increasing.
(Anomaly654 - 2017)

But the point remains that you can't get at that meaning before grasping the surface meaning
- which is to say there is always meaning.

(gib - 2017)

Mind is an ever changing dimension that is bound to reality, logic and emotion.
(Myself - 2017)
User avatar
encode_decode
Thinker
 
Posts: 981
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 4:07 pm
Location: Metaspace

Re: Konflikt - as a root philosophy.

Postby Amorphos » Tue Apr 11, 2017 9:33 pm

Couldn’t the oneness be infinite?


Indeed it would be without measure. Existence itself is not like that though. This is why most ancients considered a spiritual origin and that material existence comes after that, and is an illusion ~ because what is one is not multiple amd what is multiple is divided and not whole.

If duality is a principle then it could be that it is the oneness that is contrasting each thing.


Interesting. comparison would then perhaps manifest existence. Makes sense.
Kind of like when you contrast things in your mind it highlights them, makes one distinct from another.

I know the cosmic blender is just a device to present an idea as are some of the devices I have created in this post but it does make me wonder how it can be that the fundament became separated from the rest of totality in the first place. Are you saying the blender sits inside nothing?


Yes, we could say with respect to your outlined idea above, that the blender is the act of comparison, contrast, an observer observing an observer who exists because an observer is observing another element in the comparative/contrast.

Perhaps if you do that once it then explodes as a myriad of iterations of that process and you get universe.

There has to be the faculty or property of observing, which itself requires an act of duality. One of splitting the oneness in two such to gain the given perspective needed to observe.

Where did the blender come from?


Well, as above, but yes there has to be a duality to begin with. Thinking about this I can only conceive that reality itself at its most fundamental, is observation. This would explain why existence and eternal repetition of universe. if something is ‘looking’, then by default it has to be looking at something. Then it just so happens that everything is there to be looked at.

So in a way we have to reverse the whole blender thing, then imagine that everything is already blended, then that the observer makes a contrast simply by virtue of being an observer, and things then begin to exist [get observed].

Thereafter is relativity and qm, an act of observing itself changes that which it observes.

Can you imagine if the whole of existence is a misperception. The observer looks at nothing, sees something, and then something else exists lol

_
The truth is naked,
Once it is written it is lost.
Genius is the result of the entire product of man.
The cosmic insignificance of humanity, shows the cosmic insignificance of a universe without humanity.
the fully painted picture, reveals an empty canvas
User avatar
Amorphos
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7048
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: infinity


Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users