It isn’t that easy. Despite what people think and say, there are things that work and things that do not. What we call “religion” turns out to be, in essence, an essential to grand social structures. Atheism is merely a religion wherein Man stands in place of God. It is still just as much a religion as any has been. They don’t worship truth any more greatly than the others. The essence of religion is required. And Science is now standing in that position, because they discovered the necessity of it.
So today, Science isn’t really about science anymore, it is about public persuasion (aka “religion”). And that means being “willing to lie for the cause”. Science can’t lie quite as easily as other religions due to that concern of observational verification, but it can still lie (and does).
So to the question of what Science “should do”, you have to consider its actual role in the world of Man, not its theoretical role in history. Science could improve itself by being more precise than it has been. Taking that route would answer every philosophical question such that there really would be no more loose mindless philosophy running about. People don’t believe that can be done, some believe that it shouldn’t be done, but then what can be and what should be are exactly what philosophy is about.
From my own experience, I believe that they should go ahead through the seemingly dangerous route of improving science so that it can and will end up answering truly all questions, rather than take the more familiar route of using peoples worries and false hopes to manipulate them as has always been done. We live in a different paradigm than ever before. The real extinction of homosapian is really at hand, not merely a myth. Thus I believe it best that Man get his act together and his story actually straight so that he finally knows without and possibility of being wrong, exactly what he must do to survive (aka in religion - “command from God”).
The alternative is to hide most of science, as is being done today. That science still gets askewed and corrupted, but, as in the past religions, stays relatively clean and gets used to manipulate the world through their fantasy successes and failures until all of Man is totally replaced. Man isn’t bright enough to handle the severe weapon that Science is without Science being more perfectly done. It is like a monkey with a dirty nuclear arsenal versus a monkey with an Internet. Sufficiently precise Science to the point of answering ALL questions, keeps people alive, not replacing them.
And frankly, that is why I took the route that I have (rather than merely going along with what current Science professes and getting along with the scientific community and the world of public manipulation).