Moderator: Only_Humean
Fixed Cross wrote:The Eternal Warrior wrote:Fixed Cross wrote:Jews have been playing chess without a queen for some thousands of years.
Are these the same jews who view religion with God and the Devil without women at their sides and wondering why they fight eternally?
No Jews "wonders" why he fights, ya ignoramus. They fight for the restoration of the Temple.
And this fight is not looking be going to take forever. It's sort of sped up for them since they took control of their old land.
Inconvenience of inconveniences is that the muslims have built their own temple right on the foundation of the destroyed Jewish temple. I don't think they ever figured the Jews would make it back.
The fight isn't eternal, but the lols are infinite. And Palestine crocodile tears can will replenish the Jordan River.
Sauwelios wrote:I think he meant "why God and the Devil fight", not "why the jews [sic] fight".
I recently saw multiple documentaries come by on my YouTube feed that argue that the Temple was not where that mosque is now, but a small yet significant distance from there.
Fixed Cross wrote:Ave Sauwelios
Independently of your work, a phrase that comes up explaining my position on quantumprocessing to Pezer (on which he agrees);
"yes-gradient"
Fixed Cross wrote:Fixed Cross wrote:Ave Sauwelios
Independently of your work, a phrase that comes up explaining my position on quantumprocessing to Pezer (on which he agrees);
"yes-gradient"
I want to follow up on this.
Its been over 20 years since I first learned the principle of quantumcomputing, which was at that point still completely hypothetical.
But in the meantime, giants have been working hard and are finally making claims to having built actual quantum processors.
This is what IBM unveiled.
It warms my hear to see the old git pull off something this fresh.
A quantum-processor works with uncertainties rather than integers/absolutes. Its units, qubits, are not simply a one or a zero, but a situation from which different outcomes may follow, depending on what is required when the next task is known. This is not a new thing, it is how a brain works.
By problematizing value.
Fixed Cross wrote:How do you verify all that? Science is expensive.
The Eternal Warrior wrote:Fixed Cross wrote:How do you verify all that? Science is expensive.
Oh, you know, the way that things get verified when shitheads like you aren't there to ask such a stupid question. Generally based on the people being involved not being liars, not having a chance or will to lie about it and it being an undeniable occurrence.
Fixed Cross wrote:It is wonderful (and horribly ugly) how symmetrical natures laws make the world. I post something paradgim-shatteringly beautiful, a logic too elegant almost to bear, a source of tremendous happiness - only to be made to understand next how deeply sad the weak and ugly of this world feel about strength and beauty.
Let him suffer. It is the price for my enjoyment.
The Eternal Warrior wrote:I can see an opening in the argument where I could lay an argument ending device, but... then I thought about it, and I decided not to. You guys are fine where you are. They're grand places of logic to be in. Looks like something you worked hard to enslave yourselves to.
UrGod wrote:The Eternal Warrior wrote:I can see an opening in the argument where I could lay an argument ending device, but... then I thought about it, and I decided not to. You guys are fine where you are. They're grand places of logic to be in. Looks like something you worked hard to enslave yourselves to.
Spoken like someone who has nothing at all to say.
UrGod wrote:You don’t get to say “I could blow your argument away but I won’t” and “you’re enslaved to your ideas” without actually ...saying anything demonstrating as much. And then you certainly don’t get to whine when someone points it out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users