all formulations are wrong

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Moderator: Only_Humean

Forum rules
Forum Philosophy

Re: all formulations are wrong

Postby bahman » Mon Apr 01, 2019 4:53 pm

Any thought has a form otherwise we could not distinguish different thoughts. Therefore any thought can be expressed by a well developed language.
The sincerity in mind is the door to divine knowledge.
User avatar
bahman
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2019 3:23 pm

Re: all formulations are wrong

Postby ExtraCoronas » Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:27 pm

Jakob wrote:Looking back, the way to deconstruct reason is Tipharet, which requires contradiction.



I think reason only means something when it means something to ourselves. What does that mean? That we are made of many reasons, and that we reason those reasons in our very existing. Experience is the reasoning of our own reasons in context of reasons that are not yet us or that we are not yet aware of how they are us.

I’m order to reconcile something, contradictions much be used. Otherwise reconcile would mean nothing at all. Experience is the will to reconciliation in the sea of contradictions. But why? Not only because that is what we are but also because that is what builds reality. Motive power, meaning, will to power. Only a noob would deny the process because it involves some things that are “wrong”. Life is too deep in itself to be touched by the reasonings of noobs, philosophical or otherwise.
ExtraCoronas
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 6:31 pm

Re: all formulations are wrong

Postby barbarianhorde » Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:58 pm

ExtraCoronas wrote:
Jakob wrote:Looking back, the way to deconstruct reason is Tipharet, which requires contradiction.



I think reason only means something when it means something to ourselves. What does that mean? That we are made of many reasons, and that we reason those reasons in our very existing. Experience is the reasoning of our own reasons in context of reasons that are not yet us or that we are not yet aware of how they are us.

I’m order to reconcile something, contradictions much be used. Otherwise reconcile would mean nothing at all. Experience is the will to reconciliation in the sea of contradictions. But why? Not only because that is what we are but also because that is what builds reality. Motive power, meaning, will to power. Only a noob would deny the process because it involves some things that are “wrong”. Life is too deep in itself to be touched by the reasonings of noobs, philosophical or otherwise.

Yes. Reality always unfolds between "poles". One needs to have more than one of these poles, perspectives, to even exist.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=194877&p=2725195#p2725170

Faust wrote:Particularly as knowers, let us not be ungrateful toward such resolute reversals of the familiar perspectives and valuations with which the spirit has raged against itself all too long… : to see differently in this way for once, to want to see differently, is no small discipline and preparation of the intellect for its future “objectivity”—the latter understood not as “disinterested contemplation” (which is a non-concept and absurdity), but rather as the capacity to have one’s Pro and Contra in one’s power, and to shift them in and out, so that one knows how to make precisely the difference in perspectives and affective interpretations useful for knowledge. (GM III, 12)

That's Nietzsche.

If Nietzsche has an epistemological idea, this is it.

Knowledge is not a thing that's carved out of the world somehow. Knowledge is created in the space between perspectives. It's not a thing.
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.
~ Владимир Ильич Ульянов Ленин

THE HORNED ONE
User avatar
barbarianhorde
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1607
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 2:26 pm

Previous

Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users