Hi, not at all, tis open to all.
I’m not so sure, we all have to have a certain amount of a false face on in public. None of us feel comfortable walking round farting, picking our nose in public, or doing any other of the thousands of other little habits and oddities that we practice within our own homes. I admit I’m not sure this is linked to competition or self-awareness, but in a way I think self-awareness is a part of competition, as it is comparison of yourself with an ideal or with others.
So the decision to act in a certain kid of way and repress some caracteristic may be dictated by the social trends of the time, and the reason for doing this is in order to fit in. But what is the reason behind needing to fit in? In my view it is competition for status, mates and friends. But I am very cynical Even deciding not to fit in is a decision to try a particular tactic in social interaction, look at Goths and alternative people, all trying to be different and yet all the same (I’m vaguely one of the latter, so it’s not a dig).
On an individual level I think it would be true to see the development of WMDs as a very odd thing and that they would not naturally be created. I think it’s when we get collectives of people, such as nation states, which almost operate as independant entities with desires to protect or subsume and annex that the development is not very surprising at all.
Not only that, it only takes one person to spark off many others aquiring it to “defend” themselves by the MAD principle (god scientists can be so niave can’t they!). Japan’s development of biological agents sparked everyone else getting them. When the super powers realised they were essentially very cheap nuclear bombs (a programme I watched yesterday referred to biological bombs as 5 cent nuclear bombs, I never realised they were so powerful), they tried to bury them (who wants a cheap atom bomb? the whole poit is they have to be hard to aquire), but failed. Thus we have them proliferating. All that was a little off the point, just musing, sorry.
The point of all that was to try andshow that while at first glance the development of WMDs seems very strange, it is not actually that surprising they’re around.
What did you mean by flase construction of self? You have aroused my interest, do go on…
That’s certainly a statement I would say sum up how I feel about the survival of competition blu.
I still don’t see it as a bad thing though. I go further this time, not only does it help us establish our boundries, it pushes our entire race onwards in a voyage of discovery. How many geniuses were fiercely competitive, perhaps driving their genius? I can think of Newton and Frege as extreme examples of this off the top of my head. The were both very nasty men, and yet undeniably great. Would they have beengreat with out the friction that competition produced?
Would any of us be great without it?