I call my metaphysical views;
Interactions & Interpretations.
An organism engages the real world via a medium - usually light or atmosphere, ro electromagnetism, in the case of touch.
This is when the first interpretation occurs, from stimuli to neural pulse to be transmitted to the brain where it is translated, once more, into feelings sensation, or abstraction, idea.
Much is lost in translation. It is a necessary part of processing data - it simplifie and generalizes.
We can never know reality absolutely, but only what is most probable.
The method has been successful, because our species has survived within the world.
Interactions imply attraction/repulsion, between patterned (ordered) or non-patterned (chaotic) energies.
Chaos is always repulsive, because it can never harmonize, which is a way of saying it can never attract and stabilize into complex forms, like particles.
Harmony indicates ana agreement of patterns - overcoming what repulsion disharmony is present.
Sometimes a third pattern can mitigate to stabilize two patterns in disharmony.
Energies can be conceptualized as vibrations/oscillations - see Superstring Theory.
Order is a repeating, predictable sequence of oscillation.
Here we can borrow from Heidegger’s terminology and say that the sequence is of possibility.
Possibility for what?
For interaction.
What is vibrating/oscillating?
Space = possibility. Probability would be matter/energy, order.
Dimensions are part of the sequence.
Light, for example, is a pattern (energy) which can interact it one dimension, diminishing the possibility of its interacting in all other dimensions. This is called movement/momentum, measured relative to other patterns, as speed.
Solidity, mass, like steel, can be understood as a pattern that can interact in multi-dimensional space/time. This sharing of its probable interactivity is perceived as solidity - vibration/oscillation speed slow.
But I digress.
The ideal is of the mind, the real is of the body, physical.
Mind interprets the real, usually using a medium, like light. The accuracy of its interpretation determines the success/failure of its subsequent actions and choices, based on this interpretation.
We can never know reality absolutely, and this is why anyone who claims to have solved the problem of reality is lying, and attempting to manipulate, ro to use the absence of absolutes to exploit need/desire in others.
We can only form the most probable interpretation and the most useful.