It’s like movie stars; actors will play roles, showing the freedom of identity. Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman, but she could also be a contestant on any game show, or an employee in a HMV store. Any homo sapien can use ILP (including any monarch in history), yet never does this truth mean no war.
Like the supernatural. Demons aren’t real, yet no universe can expect to have a whole history without reference of the supernatural, like war.
There is a means to no war: homo sapiens give their perceptions of movies or art to one another (all of one another). So instead of elected representatives talking about making countries better, or rejuvenating the economy, or fighting terrorism elsewhere, they should reference those “terrorists” as the meaning of their own favourite films, or why those films are great in the first place.
If not art, and films, reference them as the importance of food being used to pass the time, or the importance of music, or fresh air, or even just talking to someone.
It may be true for the vast majority, but people generally follow the path they feel will fulfil their aspirations rather than follow the path that is “told” to them.
Is it wrong that instructions and commands represent a substantial percentage of reality (military, government, courts, companies, borders etc), or even the predominant percentage?
Of course. But how do they do that?
Reflection I think is a logical means; inspiring others can mean to reflect that which one would want reflected onto themselves - but that means the problem of mutual knowledge.
Knowledge requires history. If the reflection is the enjoyment of a movie, the movie first had to be made.