Let’s say in reference to adding a third partner who would add more clarity.
Lets say the guy would insist on equal measures of both. Would the new idea become more typical of a sustainable position at a later time, if they were to be thus interpreted? I don’t know but we may think of some such intermediate term. At this time I don’t think if there is one.
How about this way.
‘Situational Irony Definition If such an expected outcome fails and instead another contrary outcome occurs, the absurdity is termed situational irony. Such a form of irony is the result a discrepancy in perspective, such that what is known and expected at one moment differs with what is known later on.’
This analysis does seem to imply a hybrid.
Discrepancy of irony , in perspective, meaning from one moment to another. Now is this not what a regression is all about? Where certain jumps, leaving out noticeable connective elements present a dilemma between the criminals, and their trying to create an objective, from one moment to the next, an objective closely associated with an acceptable object to which lets say we both could relate to, a trancendentaly object from which we could jump over the disconnected gaps. If there is no effort to gloss over them , by ignoring them and setting up a continuum in spite of those missing variables, then the implication is, that we can never understand how each of us, or rather the prisoners merely presuppose and feign ‘understanding’ the continuous logical sequence.
Then it can be said that objectivity can not be formed, and parts of it, elements of it, are missing, but we deny the missing elements and project the emidentical or mutual and recipriticality that makes mutual understanding possible.
This is where we presume to identify on lower more general, but ‘thinner’ levels of symbolism.
That could as well be subliminally glossed over, by denying that missing train of thought, and inherently suggesting that the other has some of those missing elements in order and by virtue of finding them without merit, or worse, something offensive and incomplete. This incompleteness is denied from the Dasaine, and that in completeness is experienced as a negative part of the other.
So we construct defective objectivity under a transcendental umbrella, but after to disagree for the sake of a faux objectivity.
We agree that a simulation is better then nothing at all. We have to agree to do this, for we are in a changing perspective of various ’ no exits’ and that is something we have to endure systemically.
You may not wish to go on with such an arrangement, but then You are aware of the perilous nature of prison politics.
You’re not participating is not an option in closely related institutional part I option, and can lead to further social regression that has been pointed to by Levi Strauss and some existential analysts.
The freedom to leave, combined with personal autonomy, versus the opposite, that of being constrained by the increasingly cultish restraint exercises as the symbolic relationship things out toward one dimensionality, presents at times almost magical bindings associated with a loss of autonomy and freedom to determine levels of association and if dissassociation.