[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzG-mJgj-E4[/youtube]
Gonna be a draw. It’s logically impossible to get a mate with a king and bishop, and none of those pawns will get queened.
Send him a PM and propose a draw or you guys is wasting your time.
This game did not end in a draw.
Black to move.
Because somebody screwed up. now who was it!
Goddamnit where the fuck does black move.
Bill, the only intelligent neo-nahzoid I ever met, was aware that nahzism functions as a stimulant, he accepted it as his fetish, bragged facetiously about his priapism in the context, etc. It is porn for in the closet. Hence all the leather and Hugo Boss clothes and hatred of the purely masculine (and therefore somewhat “dry” Hebrews - who indeed historically, since the exodus, have lacked their “Shekinah”). And this is the reason why it is still somewhat offensive - I don’t like to see men kissing. I don’t mind that they do it but something in me cringes at it.
Its a veritable leatherfetish parade on ILP now. Sign of the times.
The fight against the phagemony online (I mean faggot not as a general term designating homo’s, but it refers to homo-ideologues such as our garden gnome with the moustache and his Knechtlein here) has of course been quite successful and it has forged a truly masculine spirit of philosophy, more warrior like and battle ready than philosophy has ever been. Large factor in this is my instinctive understanding of nuclear physics which eluded the classics and Schopenhauer and Nietzsche as well. But as large a factor is the fact that we have seen the loss of western masculinity through the fetishization of a garden-gnome and the weaklings idolization of said gnome as a symbol of strength - in short, we have seen the actual humiliation of nihilism as it wrought itself on the willing - we have our own sweet-voiced example of willingness in our midst - therefore we did not have a choice but to establish masculinity anew, fresh.
Fresh men - this is how we are perceived, and how we will go down in history. The only question is how much of the triumph we provide mankind we will claim for ourselves.
I very much appreciate these videos. Zoots video, though I disagree with his bookish and inexperienced method of approaching chess - it is too reverent, like I felt two years ago, before I played some thousands of 5 minute games and learned of the chaos which is implicit in good chess - is still pretty cool to watch.
I posted the weaving Frigg as a commentary on your honouring of my binding efforts (ironically, “fascism” comes from “fascere” which means “binding”) to give credit is where it is due. Valuator logic and Odins logic, these are the same thing - the grounded Will to Power, the Will which has taken root.
I did not know why at the time, but I was once called Hwergelmir.
The correct answer is F3.
The irony though is that book learning means nothing. Only doing has any meaning.
This is why the greatest philosopher of all time wrote all of his work in the form of commentary.
There is no irony in that.
Book learning is useful once one is approaching mastership. To give context to ones own genius.
Same with philosophy.
When I first read Nietzsche I had already ripened, and found only things I already knew.
Truth was there but then there was decisiveness.
Same way I suppose Carlsen reads his chess books.
He’s making points.
Making points is decidedly not the same as teaching.
Surely it is not. That does not mean that one does not teach by making points, or that one cant make points by teaching.
"When Zarathustra arrived at the nearest town which adjointh the forest, he found many people assembled in the market-place; for it had been announced that a rope-dancer would give a performance. And Zarathustra spake thus unto the people:
I teach you the Superman. Man is something that is to be surpassed. What have ye done to surpass man?
All beings hitherto have created something beyond themselves; and ye want to be the ebb of that great tide, and would rather go back to the beasts than surpass man?
What is the ape to man? A laughing-stock, a thing of shame. And just the same shall man be to the Superman; a laughing-stock; a thing of shame.
Ye have made your way from the worm to man, and much within you is still worm. Once were ye apes, and even yet man is more of an ape than any of the apes.
Even the wisest among you is only a disharmony and hybrid of plant and phantom. But do I bid you become phantoms or plants?
Lo, I teach you the Superman."
Well that was Zarathustra’s undoing, weren’t it?
Thinking that he could teach.
Moses was less naive.
What undid him was, as Ive always said, his invention of the Eternal Recurrence.
The West Coast of the United States, including Hawaii (California Plus) makes me lose a little faith in humanity.
Y’all motherfuckers in the East should secede. That Sillicon Valley cash ain’t worth it. You have Texas.
Ideally there would be a secession, followed by a war, followed by Trumpia.
I would then consider moving to Ivankatown.
And why not, fuck it, sell Alaska back to Russia.
Or, better yet, make it a jointly held territory. That would be fucking beautiful.