Guide,
I choose and have chosen not to hate I am merely trying analysing the why’s and what’s of. conflict is of primary consideration.
The most basic difference between Eros(pleasure) and Reality is by way of that very analysis of the connections. that their functions can reveal.
If someone begins to get a sense of hostility from someone else, it’s not merely an absence of love that changes connections , but the variability of meanings implied within that usage.
Fear is connected to the loss of love, but fear is of a different kind when the. construction of its opposite, can become independent of the loss of love. The opposite, or opposing feeling often develops as the result of the basic logical level of reasoning , and it becomes a kind of negation of love, a denial of sorts, seeking out a choice of bad faith dishonesty of admitting that the person feeling this way, is unable to accept such self assessment.
In fact, hate is the refusal to see goodness in one’s self on this level, and he de-differentiates love and hate into a lovehate relationship, in an effort to deny the oft used cliche : ‘killing with kindness’. The intent also reverses , to attributing intent into a positive thing.
Magj, indifference does not help a person who is intent to go above and beyond the contradiction, which is in all probability an acquired trait, and not a genetic predisposition.
I simply cam not bury a hatchet for the usual reasons of self preservation, but truly in an effort to help clear. the slate by releasing the bindings of peripheral attitudes and look below it fairly and constructively.
This position is in a way self serving, but usually for the opposite reason then For often alleged-
to gain a glimpse with perpetual contradiction. Into the more subtle world of sensing something missing in another, who can merely apprehend the misconstruence of meanings as they connect with higher and lower levels of understanding.
This is why its better to induce something then to deduce an absolute notion of how more progressive ideas should be adopted, not how they are stuck in an immobile shell of apprehension.
Politics of this kind of apprehension fall victim to its negative aspect, of looking around to see how more significant players react, and emboldened by instructive negative comments, mixing them with ideas of planted referentiality , placing them into more generally bounded
sets.