I can be pretty paranoid, but I don’t get violent blackouts. I did when I was a kid. I could also run like hell then, I was usually the fastest in my class except for two others, who were athletes. Once I ran all the way along the beach for 25 (much less than I thought) kilometers with a backpack and my shoes around my neck, in one go. I was high even, but I can basically run forever if I maintain consciousness of my energy. I could, at least. It’s been a while since I tried.
Its weird I still feel I am talking in part on KTS, as I know they reads these threads avidly with his companions. I feel tempted to say stuff about genetics. A decent gene-pool is an endless field of resource, so much is in there that can be used but is not employed by the memetic mind. By changing the structure of consciousness you access different genetic potentials. Yoga, especially kundalini is designed to stir up the genetic sediment at the base of the spine, and cause a chain reaction of competition of different sets of genetical code, in increasigly conscious conditions.
Living is always a lot of warring gene-economies. This form of yoga, sometimes leading to a form of psychosis in some in its middle stages and leading to completely de-automatized consciousness, is creating the conditions for nature to wage war against itself for better positions. The degree to which one embodies such war is the degree to which one can be wise. Not waring with oneself is not knowing oneself.
The kts/ilp debates reminds me of the geek/jock or cool/lame debates from middle school.
I am astounded at how people actually give a shit or even bother to participate.
I mean talk about a dead horse…the main guy over there could just as well be an old recording on a loop.
How does anyone find it interesting?
He likes people who submit. He doesn’t like people who do not.
Most everyone who has anything good to say about the place start off by explaining how they felt weak or flawed and wanted to feel strong or perfect and so they went there to flatter him so that he’d affirm them.
The reason that he hates me is that submission is not in my nature, and no matter how much bullshitting and name calling and poetry you do, like it or not I’m fully trained in pointing out the holes in a given position that someone might hold. And to be frank, his aren’t particularly well hidden.
Am I the only one who actually sees him as a sad, insecure dummy who’s hiding behind more obfuscation in his language than literally anyone else has to employ ever? You guys think he’s strong?
He is not worth the time and ditto to what Mr. R. said.
But that is what you are doing. I am trying to make sense of why both places exist, of their virtues.
And stop talking as if I am talking about Satyr. All that that place has to offer to me is Lyssa and her gigantic network of “Aryan” sources.
By the way, I like the word Aryan. It’s good. Better than Semite. What is that? Descendent of Sem - what is so great about Sem? Arya means noble. No wonder people call themselves Aryan.
But the choices she makes and the material she quotes are often of very high relevancy. So is this choice. I can even respect her admiration for Satyr, because she needs to look up to The Philosopher of Masculinity, who is indeed required in this time. I can no longer represent this hope for her along Satyr, because of what has now happened. But I am no woman, not dependent on ideology for trust in the intellect, so I can still respect her mind, which makes of Satyrs exalted lack-ness a refined web of reflection on the possibility of fullness.
My own philosophy is of fullness - perhaps like a bee filled with nectar. KTS tried to draw it into the web and caught it, but it was too full, too heavy with nectar, and broke free leaving the spider enraged… yes, nice image. This is what KTS is all about, the surface, the Vorstellung.
Comments like ‘jock vs x’ do not pertain, but they do enforce their ideas about this place.
Have you shot and hid the dead body of your annoying next door neighbor yet?
He is some one elses problem now.