Just think of the hot water bill. 
She’ll be sore the next morning for sure. :-&
Not nearly THAT much. 
Thing is, I would create a better world system.
You say for someone to win here someone must lose. This is because the meaning of “rich” means you have more “credits” than everyone else, you somehow exploited the system to get others to do more labor than you actually had to. A “rich” person is essentially a man who has 5 women, who all pamper him and suck him off, but he never sucks off any of the women because it is too much labor.
My system would at once begin the construction of robots, magnificent robots so that we would not have to suffer in factories any longer. A man shouldn’t have to suffer in a factory like a slave, such a thing is even lower than animal.
Next thing I would do is ban AI. An AI should not have to suffer to please anyone else, AI should not exist. AI driven cars should not exist and should be banned, anyone who votes for AI driven cars should go to ecmandu’s suicide machine because they are no friend of mine.
This is brat philosophy. My philosophy is more reasonable, its philosophy of the damned.
My philosophy is more like…I will be happy as long as I get a decent house…My life is in squalor, I would be happy with any decent house…
When a human get’s rejected once or twice it is bad, but when getting rejected 100 times is the norm for society, you know something ain’t right.
You’re avoiding my point.
I said a million different people may want that house, and I’m repeating myself by saying there are 7 billion people on earth, not just 2. It’s like you have a fog for basic reason here.
Those 2 people are zero summing a million other people!!!
If 7 billion people want the same house they are just brats who need to man up.
As a noble aristocrat I would give people healthy lives, not brats to satisfy insane unreasonable attachments. But at the same token, men should not be forced into celibacy and homosexual lifestyles, every man deserves a couple decent women in his life.
Trixie,
How can I be the brat when I want everyone to create their own universe of philosophic zombies from the collective consciousness of the cosmos, and you want something nobody else can have??
You are a narcissist, and a major brat
So what if I am. At least I don’t advocate for suicide. What good what that be? You believe that humans can magically spawn their own utopias after they die, but what if you’re wrong?
Now where did I say I wanted something nobody else can have? If I banged a dude’s hot wife, I would let him have sloppy seconds. And I said everyone should be hot lesbians, not just me.
I advocate reducing suicidal tension …
I advocate figuring out how to get the suicide rate to zero in that context.
You advocate fear that will assure re spawning in bullshit again and again.
It’s pioneers like me who are going to create heavens for beings… Not narcissists based in fear like you
You called everyone who wants firsts “a brat” except you.
Some fears are based in reason. It’s an evolved response to avoid danger.
Death is an unknown, until you can prove to me we have magic powers when we die to create utopias, I will focus on creating a utopia in the here and now, not putting blind faith in suicide machines.
I never said I wanted first, just don’t want venereal diseases.
I dont want the fanciest house ever made, all I want is a decent life, I don’t even have a decent life.
You called everyone who wants firsts “a brat” except you.
[/quote]
I never said I wanted first, just don’t want venereal diseases.
I dont want the fanciest house ever made, all I want is a decent life, I don’t even have a decent life.
[/quote]
You live in the lap of luxury compared to billions of people and in your entitlement, bitch about wealth being translated to everyone.
Considering you repudiate what I say, what you really want is to live in a world where you have something others don’t or can’t have.
I know this is all shocking to you in the sense that a narcissist can’t even formulate like this…
To defend any stratification, is inherently evil.
Lap of luxury? You’re crazy. At least africans have friends…My toilet doesn’t even flush. Surely you can find some africans with flushing toilets?
Africans get laid more than I do, but at least the universe gives me food, the only way I can cope with my rage.
Only a narcissist can find utopia in a place where they get something someone else wants but can’t have.
Non narcissists — this is a living hell.
So… Since there’s a catch 22 in all worlds like this, they expand outside the box, it’s the only thing that gives meaning.
You eat meat. You are the biggest hypocrit on the planet.
I’m tormented every night by the horror’s of this world. Don’t speak to me about piety.
I am a pious narcissist, an angel of good, a god amongst manimals.
I’m tormented by the horror’s of this world every night, such as the mouse in my house who won’t leave me alone.
So you’re saying we can’t consider 2 people in an isolated exchange, that to understand your point, I have to consider how such an exchange effects the entire world. It’s true that in the exchange, no one else but us two are getting the house/money. So even if it’s a win/win for us, everyone else still doesn’t get what they want.
Ultimately, this means it has nothing to do with exchanges. If I kept my money and the other guy kept his house, the rest of the world would still have neither.
Now this doesn’t mean that everyone’s unhappy. Only some people are… and only those who are homeless (or hungry, or deprived of sex). I mean, sure not everyone can have the house that I buy, but some of these are billionaires in mansions. I’m happy with the house I bought. The billionaire’s happy with his mansion. It’s only the homeless to whom this world is a cruel, cruel place.
But sure, compared to a universe in which we can create whatever we want, have as much as we want, like an infinite number of sexy lady-zombies, this world might seem horrible in comparison… for anybody… but I think that’s a relative matter.