Very tru w. Further incursions about population’s right to exist, en mass, reflected by Oppeheir’s observance and subsequent exclamation, ‘Now, I am become death, the destroyer of worlds’- the relevance of which, fits perfectly , the relevance of a pre-verbiage logic superceeding those of analysis- is so fitting a reflection to the lack of transperancy to the public of what possible roads we are lead towardupon.
Again , interjections do have and can have mathematical underpinnings, likewise, which is not to say, they would be subject to the same kind of scrutiny.
Awareness of languages of transi finite values imply just that, and any comment reversely suggests the same insignification of signs within which the philosophies of language, logic and mathematics operate. That is in no way a diversion to place any one of them into a special sense of approbation.
Rather, it is an effort to balance a seemingly favored language, to show a break, instead of an interlace of derivatives, elevating priesthood from a sensible function into an esoteric device, as has occurred to repeat with the so called death of god.
Hoping this will not exhaust your patience, as has mine, since we have reached a stage in urgency, where interpretation must consider math above and beyond merely utilitarian aspects.
I refer the pre quantified sources of earliest mathematical principles, as those underlying logic, and the accession to logical sense, before those of math. The principle of the exclusion of the middle, comes directly from a psychological flight or fight, there was no holding or suspending at that time.
The priesthood of any holding came later, and lest these are forgotten, we err on standing on very thin ice.
For the forum , the only defense to the use of a function thereof, is to show the multiform reason for its analysis in the first place, and notto topple the priesthood in the second.
This is the last mathelogical comment I shall post, again no intent other than relevance here, neither any other kind of show.