You will run out of numbers even between 0.0000000001 and 0.0000000002.
You will run out of numbers before you get from 0 to 10^-100.
James, the man’s been to Hell. He knows things which can’t even be known.
James, you’re just trolling now …
It’s pathetic…
You don’t run out of numbers in infinite series
You shouldn’t be calling anyone a troll or pathetic.
You run out of numbers as soon as you have to count infinitely more than once in the same set. There are more than a simple infinity of numbers between any two numbers, no matter how small. That is why they call it “uncountable”.
James, I discovered dimensional flooding!!
I figured out that if you increase operators, you can get around it!
You are trolling to say that there are more numbers between 0 and 2 as 0 and 1 and you damn well know it !!
It doesn’t matter what you have discovered. You run out of numbers after your first infinity and that is only one out of infinitely more. You are always infinitely short of numbers.
I didn’t say that.
James, this whole reply is nonsense from start to finish…
I can’t believe after my proof of counting all rationals and irrationals, that you still have your feet dug in like this!
As I told you in the beginning, there is a difference between counting and accounting for. Putting numbers in a pattern doesn’t mean that you have counted them.
If you have the real numbers, then tell me how many there are.
Understood…
1:1 correspondence is considered “counting” in math, but that’s obviously poorly worded unless you allow for multiple definitions…
Accounting is a decent word actually …