The creator of this thread should rename their username to globalist stool pigeon.
Lol…
I may be what you call a “globalist”,
but I’m more like a free pro-“globalism” ideologist,
not a stool pigeon linked to a greater power.
Well met, Mr. stool pigeon of the nationalists!
Freedom and globalism, very contradictory mix of words you have going on there.
Freedom and globalism, very contradictory mix of words you have going on there.
Not necessarily a contradiction. If you understand the (potential) ideal nature of globalism: it is just the sacking, or rather reemployment, of nationalist and macroeconomic “parasites”.
This can naturally only be followed by the disintegration of (anti-individualist) evil in all its forms (financial/usury/central bank cultism, herdist: zealous religionism etc.)
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUXX_aqkWh0[/youtube]
Mags … are you referring to the puppeteers of Sykes and Picot as in Sykes-Picot accord?
…just like how the West divided up India and Africa (and other lands much more prior than that) for themselves… how very novel.
Will we see an end to divide and rule in this modern era? or fear further reprisals beyond terrorist attacks…
A much less known event took place in a tiny village in Portugal … Fatima … about a year later. I have often wondered if there is any connection between the choice of location for the event and the Prophet Mohamed’s daughter Fatima.
Fatima.jpg
A connection beyond their names?
First step is to ban abrahamic religions
Banning how people think sounds suspiciously Orwellian to me
And particularly when it involves half of the worlds population