Sure, and that is the point in denigrating the
difference between so called real and made up facts.
That is exactly how misinformation as a way of controlling both re-presentation of facts, works to mute both the media and the constituency.
It is a very shrewd power grab and that is how it’s done. (For there is little else left),(After the fall of ideology)
First the original complicity-(Trump-Russia) is leaked.
Then the media takes it up. Then congress and the
president are consulted of the need to keep it under wraps, usually for national security purposes. Then there is the next level where a pseudo victim is
selected-(our man Flynn). Then the victim seeks immunity well knowing it will not be given, so he clams up. The intelligence meanwhile is in the dark, and without a doubt, they are used for this purpose.
The buck stops there, and if any traces are still entertained by the left wing, they usually erode over
time. End of story.
Once there was a book written gaining semi popular success among the politically indigent titled "None
Dare call it a conspiracy. But that was a long time
ago. Memory fails quickly.
THEREAL QUESTION AT THIS POINT IS WHETHER A
NATIONAL SECURITY WEAKNESS IS REALLY
EVIDENTIARY TO SUPPORT COLLUSION ON ALL LEVELS, OR, IF, ONE WILL NEED TO BE INVENTED.
North Korea is a very good overture because, it is the most credible one. What ultimate position China takes on this issue remains to be seen.