I saw what you highlighted, not erotic at all. Then you said it leaves more to the imagination.
In which case, why not call “walls” erotic, they leave even more to the imagination.
I saw what you highlighted, not erotic at all. Then you said it leaves more to the imagination.
In which case, why not call “walls” erotic, they leave even more to the imagination.
Arcturus Descending: Ultimate Philosophy 1001:What did I type after that?
“What you favor is one-size fits all, remove all spice and flavor, in order to not offend the allergic.”
You didn’t get the meaning of what I typed.
But I did respond to what you typed above.
I saw what you highlighted, not erotic at all. Then you said it leaves more to the imagination.
In which case, why not call “walls” erotic, they leave even more to the imagination.
Well, if we base your statement on Plato’s cave, those walls might indeed become quite erotic - to our own desires.
Ultimate Philosophy 1001:I saw what you highlighted, not erotic at all. Then you said it leaves more to the imagination.
In which case, why not call “walls” erotic, they leave even more to the imagination.
Well, if we base your statement on Plato’s cave, those walls might indeed become quite erotic - to our own desires.
We aren’t talking about your heavenly walls, we are talking about saying that a cotton ball or a piece of cheese is erotic. Why not say everything is erotic because you can just use your imagination. And the only things that are not erotic, are actual sexual things, because they could possibly turn someone off.
We aren’t talking about your heavenly walls,
So are you saying here that the erotic cannot also be seen as 'heavenly"?
we are talking about saying that a cotton ball or a piece of cheese is erotic.
In the right hands, those tools can become quite erotic.
Why not say everything is erotic because you can just use your imagination.
Can you say with certainly that everything cannot become erotic with the aid of one’s imagination?
And the only things that are not erotic, are actual sexual things, because they could possibly turn someone off.
That would depend on how sexually explicit they are. One man’s or woman’s meat is another’s poison.
We aren’t talking about your heavenly walls,
So are you saying here that the erotic cannot also be seen as 'heavenly"?
I was trying to say that your heavenly walls were erotic more so than even a cotton ball or piece of cheese.
Arcturus Descending:We aren’t talking about your heavenly walls,
So are you saying here that the erotic cannot also be seen as 'heavenly"?
I was trying to say that your heavenly walls were erotic more so than even a cotton ball or piece of cheese.
This is certainly true.
Woke up horny this morning, was about to write an erotic story in the Creative Corner, sat down, and the sitting down changed my blood circulation and I couldn’t muster it.
My question is, would I be banned for this? And don’t think that I didn’t write it for fear of being banned, I am a free spirit and I do not respect the whims of mere mortals. I did not write it simply because I was no longer in the mood.
You get turned off just by sitting down?
Would I have been banned for this in a forum devoted to so-called free thinking?
So talking about a natural biological function, essential to the survival of any species, is off-limits in a philosophy forum? Talking about the glorious heights and depths of human passions and human happiness, possibly one of the most exuberant times of our lives, and a key tenant of human nature, is off-limits in a philosophy forum? What is this, some kind of joke? What kind of fascism is this? Human backwards traditions and idiocy at it’s finest.
Geez, haven’t even posted your story and you’re already griping about being censored.
Well, I think if you write like the above–tying your libido into biology, survival, censorship, etc.–you could easily make it philosophical (you can actually make anything philosophical–everything can be tied into deep issues in our lives).