Dogs originated in Europe, well before white people showed up. Those Europeans have for the most part been bred out against other races (including whites) several times over since then. I recall seeing Magsj on one of the genetics sites I used to visit, she can fill you in. I would hardly claim they are extinct, but their characteristics just aren’t dominant anymore.
Whites are little more than a Steepe Mongrol that pushed into Europe late. Blue eyes came earlier, but they were dark skinned.
Dogs were already in use throughout much of the world by this point.
Have no clue why someone would assume dogs like white people more than black, they like who feeds and shelters them. And some of these “white people domesticated breeds of Dogs” are just fucking atrocious. Miniature Poodles. You can’t blame that on black people. Not all, but most stupid useless breeds of dogs can be blamed on white people who have nothing better to do than to get groups of misfit dogs with odd traits to fuck other groups of misfit dogs with equally odd characteristics till these little freaky toy breeds emerge.
The humans who domesticated dogs in Europe split, with a population migrating away from Europe. It caused the European population to bottleneck, which is noticeable in modern genetic studies (dogs experienced this too).
In the end, we can’t point to modern Europeans or Whites as the original source, as the people who did it spread out all over. We cant even say “Africans” didn’t breed them, as that population would of looked rather black to us, just most of the people we call Africans today didn’t initially play a crucial role. Back in the day though, we were all black.
I just don’t get this thing about having to claim who did what when first… we, as the human race, have come a (collective) long way, but the journey has only just begun, and still we fight like newly-formed tribes in their infancy.
You don’t understand it, magsy. They keep ragging on how they’ve been cleaning and neating everything up all by themselves with no recognition and want to rub it on your face every chance they get, but it’s not to be bitchy. White man just wants a little bit of recognition from time to time. They’ve been busting their asses to make you smile, and you just take it for granted. Buy them flowers, tell them they look beautiful today, ask them what they did to their hair or what perfume their’re wearing. It takes so little effort, and it really puts a smile on their faces. You gotta keep that spark going in their little blue eyes.
Arbie, you’re once… twice… three times a white maaan
There are also scientists, biologists, inventors, entrepreneurs etc. to add to that list, but I prefer yours… mine would have been something along the lines of yours, but I’m far too serious to post it.
You’re pathology is commonplace in the US, nothing very interesting or mysterious. You hate because you loath yourself. Your bigotries are a reflection of your own perceived deficiencies. And in archetypal form, the characteristics of your insults towards blacks indicate that you hate yourself because deep down inside, you believe that you’re stupid.
Learn to like yourself, find that thing you’re good at (hint: internet philosophy ain’t it), and it’ll work itself out … or be the angry young man (it’s up to you, but the former will get you laid much more often).
Zoot, that was hilarious. Big Cynthia taking up 2 spots, it’s funny cause she’s fat
Even though I have explicitly stated I am not American. This is why this child is so angry at me. It is xenophobic, afraid of something different because it doesn’t know how to deal with it. Easy to mock a crazy redneck Christian fundamentalist holding onto his bible… but what do you do against somebody who isn’t a religious person, and doesn’t care about US politics?
I have no problems admitting that blacks, on average, are better runners than whites and due to a denser muscular structure, also better in plenty other sports. Just like I have no problem admitting that blacks have higher testosterone. You know, because I care about how reality and nature actually is, I am not a politically motivated American liberal or conservative who selectively looks at parts of nature he likes, and the parts he dislikes he labels ‘racist’, ‘sexist’, or some other X-ist.
I adore myself.
What bigotries?
What insults?
People in real life, you know, those who ACTUALLY KNOW ME, tell me I like myself a bit too much.
But what the heck, why would I not take advice from somebody over the internet who knows nothing about me and has written posts to me filled with nothing but baseless assumptions, accusations, and insults.
No?
Oooooh, it will get me laid more often? Well in that case, disregard reality and exploring it, and fuck philosophy altogether. Thanks for revealing this higher purpose of life, ‘getting laid’. A true American hedonist materialist, aren’t you.
The purpose of my life is getting laid from now on. Tell me more on how to accomplish it, master, what other parts of reality I have to ignore? Everything that causes me emotional discomfort? That doesn’t flatter my immediate interests?
Hah
Just to make it clear, I don’t consider myself intellectually even near those people I listed, nor do I think I or other white people deserve praise and worship because of accomplishments of specific individuals.
I am just pointing out the general truth - that it is white men who have done the most important things in history.
Nothing to see here.
A liberal coward deploying the usual cod psychoanalysis and reverse psychology in an effort to personalize the debate and shut it down.
What’s ironic is that this turd has been taught this drivel by others.
That is a measure of this ‘free thinker’.
Liking yourself is about fitting in, accepting the status quo.
By complying with common values you’re more likely to get laid.
Surely that’s the ultimate goal of every modern thinker?
Worst of all the simpleton actually thinks ILP is a philosophy forum.
The dynamic is one where feminization has won over a weak masculine nature in the white liberal male.
He finds safety in hiding behind institutions who act as proxy alphas.
Hence he condemns loudly and uses emotive, feminine tactics to undermine his opponent.
But he is only a surrogate male, not a real one, getting his authority from the establishment.
The give away of a typical beta is using the possibility of sex to placate rebellious, more masculine males.
It’s something that can be observed extensively in primate groups.
When I was in the county jail there was a black dude from Nigeria in the same dorm as me. He was so black he was purple, and he had that thick, imperial Nigerian accent; when this dude got angry you knew he was about to pull a machete on your ass and cut you in half. Well this dude was waiting for trial on some dumb motor vehicle charge he had gotten while visiting some family here in the the U.S. He was extremely educated and well mannered, and he COULD NOT STAND the black people in that jail. He referred to them as American monkeys. That guy made a lasting impression on me and my views about race and culture.
Yeah Zoot, I know a similar black guy, not personally, but from elsewhere on internet, who despises the modern American gangster culture and the way of behaving and speaking like in Ecclesiastes’ video above, and yes, sounded well educated and well mannered.
Good. Then as a rule of thumb, never say anything about black people in general that you would not be willing to say to him. Would you want to offend this black person who is not part of the ‘american gangsta culture’? Of course not. And he would join you in a minute in a critique about particular black people, and have much to say. The Nigerian and I talked all the time about stuff like this. He was a great exception to the rule and deserving of my respect.
Hey, if whitey is so mighty, why are there so many stupid white people in America? Why is always our, shall we say, intellectually unendowed, who hate non-whites so much (oh wait, I just explained why in my last post)? I guess the irony of it all still never ceases to amaze me.
Oh yeah, the irony of being called a simpleton by someone who names himself after a book in the buy-bull is pretty rich … fun times
The dimwit hasn’t realized that intelligence is a bell curve, with HALF below average.
Because it automatically imagines it is in the upper half.
Then it makes the false correlation between low intelligence and socially unacceptable opinions.
It’s the forbidden nature of the opinions that causes anxiety in those who want to belong.
The chance to condemn an out group for peer approval.
The argument itself is not considered.
All of the greatest minds in Western history are considered racist by modern standards.
And yet dimwit tells us that it is the result of low intelligence.
When all such debate is off limits with career ending penalities to those that try.
Their reasoning is as valid today as it was centuries ago.
Nature has not changed in the space of a few hundred years.
