[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYhLnYnrivI[/youtube]
Ruby Friedman & Nick Page – You’ll Never Leave Harlan Alive
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTBP3yGzJqE[/youtube]
GTA Vice City Fever 105 Full Radio Station
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V46NFCtaJI[/youtube]
Fat Larry’s Band - Act Like You Know 1982 (remastered audio)
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7sXJjSuTAw[/youtube]
TWO IF BY SEA(BULLOCK/LEARY)
imdb.com/title/tt0118002/
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qem3h4fAqhA[/youtube]
Sandra Bullock & Denis Leary, promo-interview about their movie “Two If By Sea” (1996)
Ah, Rumiesque
How do we come to recognize them - to know them?
Love.
Ah, Jakob, that is not a satisfactory answer for me. It leaves me hungry for more.
Do you mean “God” when you say “Love”?
Do you mean a love of something, like passion (non-sexual) and curiosity which leads us to seek those answers?
I am not sure if Barbarianhorde was speaking of a process where the questions eventually lead to the answers or if he meant, literally, that the question itself is or was always the answer!
I was wrong. It was not Rumi, though I love his words. It was Rilke I was thinking of.
“Be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and try to love the questions themselves, like locked rooms and like books that are now written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.”
That is so profound, One of my favorite quotes though not such an easy thing to follow.
How does love do it?
Oh, if only I had a telescope.
Hi Meno,
Well, this is true. Eventually we will get our answers through paying attention/observing, listening, thinking things out, following the journey to the end of its process.
Is that the sum and substance of Barbarianhorde’s statement? I wanted something deeper. 
“Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.”
This is so sublime, as to suggest an unending horizon stretched out to within an iota of an image, carried by the most subtle whispering breeze between a gentle bough , into an unimaginable set of possibilities , unbound to almost an unimaginable far flung proximity, still pulling in with an umresistable force.
I am unsure about Barbarian, but the question of who consumes whom more profilically has come up like a zeitgeist , irrespective of relative spatial temporal considerations. That is not trying to best one unto the other, only seeking the level of comprehension between levels of energy containment, or, as an inquiry as to who travels deeper , in most senses of that word?
May be even not in the relative comparative view of description of how low they went , but in the sense of how low (or high!) did they, in a hidden internexus.
Here some tried:
Rilke’s poetry, reflecting the challenges of the modern world, has been interpreted and alluded to by many artists, writers, and musicians. Ibn Gabirol sums up the provenance of these three poets in his philosophic work The Fountain of Light: “sometimes [you feel] that you are only part of them [spiritual substance], because of the bond between you and between physical being; and sometimes it will seem to you that you are the sum total of these [spiritual] substances and that there is no difference between you and them.” As he declares in “And Don’t Be Astonished”: “he’s soul encircling the physique,/and a sphere in which all is held.” Rumi expresses this experience in “Suddenly A Moon Appeared”: “For in the moon, my body, by grace had become soul./And when I traveled in this soul, I saw nothing but moon,/Until the mystery of eternal theophany lay open to me.” He puts it succinctly in “Ode 2721”: “For the fire within us/There is no translaton"
Thanks Arc, that was perfect. I had to source it out. ( was going to write , sort it out)