Lol in order to develop a military you already must have developed other significant aspects of economy. You can’t have military clothes, food supplies, materials for vehicles/ammo/weapons etc. without a proper economy. What is it exactly that NatSoc economy lacked that is relevant in any way?
So according to you countries should adopt a strategy that I’ve proven to be, ceteris paribus, less effective? Good to know.
If 6 million Axis soldiers can cause 18 million ally casualties, then if Axis and Allies fought and they both had 6 million, Axis would win easily since 18 million allies are needed to kill 6 million Axis soldiers and 6 million Axis soldiers can kill 18 million ally soldiers, which makes killing 6 million allies a piece of cake for the Axis boys.
Under the assumption that both sides have equal quality, the side with more quantity will win, and the more quantity it has the easier it will win and with fewer losses.
Only under the assumption that one side (Axis) has superior quality can you explain the fact that it inflicted so much damage to the other side despite the other side being so much more numerous and despite the fact that Axis were aggressors which puts them at a disadvantage.
What’s complicated here? Are you really too stupid to grasp this?
Not like it’s news that fascist/NatSoc men tend to be masculine and value physical and mental fitness while the more liberal a man the more likely he is to be a weak effeminate faggot who wouldn’t last a second on the battlefield, either because he is physically unfit, or a pussy who might decide to do a non-violent protest in front of enemy machine guns instead, trying to guilt-trip them into losing or something.
So in short the only reason allies won is that they had a huge starting advantage in numbers.
Given more time to develop, if axis caught up in numbers to the point the numbers were equal they’d win easily.
What’s more, if after catching up in terms of population the Axis continued growing instead of going to war it’d outclass the allies both in quantity AND quality.
This is my entire point… all other factors equal, a system like fascism/NatSoc or any patriarchal, militaristic system based on acknowledging NATURE is the most powerful possible form of social ordering and ceteris paribus, the best bet at winning a conflict.